My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02161
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02161
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:34:56 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:56:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.600.60
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Basin Member State Info - Utah
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/1/1968
Title
Utah Desalting Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-12- <br /> <br /> <br />I-" <br />00 <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />(c) The proces~ is highly adaptable for use in conjunction with <br />the simultaneous production of power and process steam from <br />a large scale mutti-purpose facility located at a single toca- <br />tion having a fossil or nuclear heat source. <br /> <br />Specific advantages using the electrodialysis process include: <br /> <br />(a) ~D process permits high flexibility in plant location with <br />respect to feedwater supply, power source and pr04uct water <br />use to achieve the greatest economic advantage of plant <br />operation. <br /> <br />(b) Air and environmental pollution around the Salt Lake City <br />area caused by operation of a locally based heat source can <br />be prevented through transmission of power to the ED plant <br />from a power plant located at a remote location. <br /> <br />(c) Because of its operating flexibility, the ED plant can be <br />operated in a manner to take advantage of low cost off-peak <br />power supply. <br /> <br />(d) Technological advances expected in high te~perature feedwater <br />ED plant operation, using heat from a separate coal fired <br />boiler or from a multi-purpose heat source, could potentially <br />reduce desalted water costs by as much as 30% over low temp- <br />erature feedwater ED plant operation. <br /> <br />6. Preliminary estimates of desalting and associated costs indicate <br />that water reclamation should be considered in the development of future <br />water plans in Utah as an alternative source of supply. Total costs for <br />500 ppm desalted potable water delivered to the Salt Lake City msins are <br />estimated to fall within $63-$108 per acre-foot, using a feedwater salinity <br />of 2500 ppm. Total costs were similar for either a multi-stage flash dis- <br />tillation unit at Little Mountain or an electrodialysis unit at the Jordan <br />River delta. <br /> <br />7. There is a major potential industry for minerat recovery and <br />processing utilizing brines from Great Salt Lake. The current indicated <br />pot~ntial of the Great Salt Lake mineral industry and other industries <br />along the Wasatch Front could provide msrkets for any electrical energy <br />and process steam which might be associated with the desalting complex <br />considereq in this study. Current utility planning includes power need~ <br />in the amount of 500 MWe by the 1975 period and an additional 500 MWe block <br />prio~ to the 1985 period. This is exclusive of the additionat load required <br />for desalting, A more detailed study and market projection are needed to <br />fully assess the potential industrial power and process steam requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.