Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l <br /> <br />Od. 27. 1974 <br /> <br />31 >(.. <br /> <br />A SECTION ON THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE WEST <br /> <br />Billion <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Dollar Shale Pullout Decision Outlined <br /> <br /> <br />BJ STEVE WYNKOOP ments or an aodent ocean buried in Cllo- <br />De-nnr P05t Staff Writer rado's Piceance Basin. <br />The manager 0{ a Colorado project that The sediments didn't quite turn to oD, <br />was closest to making a billiCfl..dollar de- but all that Is needed Is some heat.-and <br />hydrogen to do the trick. r <br />cision 10 den-lop oU shale is less than <br />The knowledge that almost two trlllion <br />enthusiastic about Its proopects. barrels of oil is at your fingertips is a <br />~ollis M. Dole. manager of the ()))OIly tantalizing inCt'ntive to find eronomical <br />Development Operation, says oil II h a I e ways to extract it. <br />may never be developed unless there are While oil-shale proponents Inside and <br />more tanrable goyernmental policies and outside of major oil companies are still <br />an end to inflation. promoting oil shale and making optimistic <br />statements about its future. the company <br />For more than 70 years, men ha\'1!I that had done the most work and was <br />Cr@amed about unlocking the world's larg. closest to constructing a comm@rcial <br />est hydrocarbon deposit from the scdi. operation has pulled out. <br /> <br />l\'hen Colony Development Operation dollar dtocisI.on to pull back from 011 ~. <br />announced Oct. '" It was Indefinitely into the billioo.(\oUar dedslon to pull back <br />suspending plans to build Its proposed from 011 shale. <br />Colony Development Is . Joint venture <br />SO,OOO barrel-per-day oil-shale plant near sponsored by Atlantic- Richfield Co. <br />Grand Valley, Colo., the nascent oil-shale (ARoo), The Oil Shale Corp. (TOSCO), <br />industry received a blow from whicb It Shell Oil Co. and Ashland Oil, Inc. <br />might not rectl\'er. ARCO was to be the operator of the <br />Added to this Is the detmnlnation of the plant. <br />Federal Energy Administration (FEA) to Unless economic and political climate! <br />reject the goal of U.S. energy indepen- change dramatically, Dole aaid, eompa- <br />dence and accord oil shale a low priority nles that are four to five years behind <br />e\'en 11 independence from foreign oil Colony in oil shale will be coofronted with <br />Sources were made a national goal. the same painful decision. <br />In an extensive inter....lew last week, Dole, as assistant secretary for mineral <br />DoJe spelled out what \\-rot into the billion. resourees from 1969 to 1973, was so bullish <br /> <br />. . <br />Billion-Dollar Deelslo~ <br />On Shale Pullout Outlined <br />nolI!' remains convmced that <br />Continued from page 3': \the plant would, have ml!'t all <br />hat WllS man:Ina.1\y a1tfllct~ve ,environmental entena. . <br />t aboUt J1 per cl!'nt, aCCOrdm~\ M !'UCh. he stated. It w.oulrl <br />- - . -",rd of ('n....U'on- <br />o industry sour~s,. have !let a al~ _ <br />t With Arab oil i/:OIng for about, mental commitment that i~ <br />th ~ml!' price and Presldl'nt ~ du~lrV ~enerallY would ha~1!' <br />Fe dtrvitijt to forcl!' down the I ~n 'expected to [0110"'. <br />oi~P of domestic oi~. .011 Sha~e I "Ilhmk it Is too bad \\'1' 'tH'rp <br />~~gj.t lOOK promiSing no 'I bl to han i/:one forward <br />........'. . nol a e h bel!'n thl!' <br />Doll' !'.aId '\bf>eause it would, a\'1!' de- <br />DEC1SI0~ ",WE .. no first malOr nf'''' mdustry to sed <br />"EconomicallY Ihl'fP ":,11 Dolf' velop under Ow Mwl~ p:lS:-d <br />way you co,uld m<lKe It'llrt~erS I!'nvironmenHll regulatlOnS an <br />-d ttwo jomt.wnture p ~ .. [)ole lIald, <br />~1 1 act._, <br />conclurlt'd Oct. ~ ( <br />~ ..., <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />on oll shale that he was widely suspectt:'d <br />by environmentalists of developing a fed- <br />eral leasing program that would be a <br />giveaway to the oil companies. <br />Dole was once a member of a large c0- <br />terie of oil shalers whose true faith Is that <br />oil shale will be developed. Tbe only ques- <br />tion is when, they say. <br />Now, whl!'n asked if 011 shale will be de- <br />veloped, Dole cites a list of economic and <br />social factors and concludes: <br />"When these things come Into Juxtaposl- <br />tlon, then it will go. It might be tomor- <br />row. It might be ne....er." <br />Dole spew from experience. He's been <br />further into the business of making 011- <br />shale development worlt than any other <br />Individual. <br />His operation was on the brink of com- <br />mitting nearly a billion doUars on the ....en- <br />ture, when from the corporate board <br />rooms came the fateful word Oct. 1: Stop. <br />The reasons given for the decision wl!'re <br />double-digit inflation, uncertainty In feder- <br />al energy policy and tight money. <br />Dole clings to those reasons:, while <br />others ha....e speculated that it was pres- <br />sure from environmentalists or inside in. <br />formation that the rEA would frown on <br />oil shale that motivated the decision. <br />Rising cost estimates for constructing <br />the oil-shale plant were the largest single <br />factor in the decision, Dole said. <br />A consultant to Colony did a million- <br />dollar study of the cost of constructing an <br />oil-shale plant that would turn 66,000 tons <br />of raw shale into 50,000 barrels of oil <br />every day. <br />That early estimate in l!1i3 ~ho\\-"ed that <br />a plant could be built for $250 to $300 <br />million, Dole said. <br /> <br />By the first of this year, another consul- <br />tant retained to do cost studies, estimated <br />the plant would cost $400 million to $450 <br />million. After that estimate was given, <br />ARCQ officials said oil could be produced <br />at S6 a barrel. <br />But the figures kept creeping upwards. <br />And Colony had already started to get <br />worried after it saw the Jan. 1 figures, <br />Dole said. <br />With a decision made to start construc- <br />tion in May of 1975, Colony, with a wary <br />eye on inflation, asked for monthly <br />report! oncosts. <br />Then, Dole started looking around for <br />materials to build the plant with. It woUld <br />be a huge project. Eacb of the 10 units <br />that would heat the shale to extract oil <br />would be as tall as the Denver Hilton <br />Hotel. <br />Dole says Colony found that mawrial <br />suppliers \It'anted virtual blank checks for <br />plant components and longer lead times to <br />build them than expected. <br />Meanwhile, higher and higher cost es- <br />timates for construction kept rolling In. . <br />By September, the consultants estimat. <br />ed that it would cost a staggering $9\5 <br />million to build the plant. <br />Even t!wn, some in Colony clung to the <br />belief that ARCQ, which had sunk $5lI <br />million into oil shale already, would bet <br />"on the come" and let the project con- <br />tinue. <br />Colony trlmmf'd $65 milllon off the con- <br />sultant's cost estimate and passed the <br />.....ord that the plant would probahly cost <br />$850 mi1Jion. <br />At that. oil from shale would cost $12 a <br />barrel with a rate of return on investment <br />Continued on page 33. <br /> <br />00<19 <br />