My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02128
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:34:42 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:55:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.110.60
Description
Colorado River Water Users Association
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/20/1969
Author
CRWUA
Title
Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ELLIS 1. ARMSTRONG <br /> <br />On balance, I do not think we have done too badly, Before the, dams were built, the river was <br />little more than a sluiceway for silt and debris of all types that washed off of the Colorado Basin <br />lands, Only above Grand Junction did the Colorado and :its tributaries contribute anythin~ of value as <br />far as sports fishing was concerned, As for recreation, there was virtually no public enjoyment of the <br />river except for the handful of intrepid souls who followed John Wesley Powell's pioneering voyage <br />down the Grand Canyon just a century ago, <br /> <br />Today, of course, all that has changed. There are clear water lakes all 'the way down from the <br />tributaries to the southern border interspersed with clear' cold running water which is developing some <br />of the. best stream fisheries in the world, Utah State biologists, for example, consider the Green <br />River below Flaming Gorge Dam as the best trout fishing stream in the State. It is true that there is <br />fluctuation to meet necessary powerplant operations, but this is nowhere near the seasonal fluctuation <br />of the natural river and it is managed in such a way that it does not change the fish, or prevent <br />enjoyment of the stream, <br /> <br />Or jumf all the way downstream to the 260,mile reach of the river from Davis Dam south to the <br />Internationa Boundary and the Lake Mead National Recreation Area upstream to the boundary of <br />Grand Canyon National Monument, This area alone annually hosts about 8 million man,days of <br />recreational activity, It is this Reclamation-created environment below Davis Dam in which acres <br />upon acres of new plants and trees took advantage of >\ new water supply to flourish in many back, <br />waters. These large marshy areas now' present a dile~ma to the Bureau of Reclamation and the <br />water users who have contracts with the United States fdr the river water, <br /> <br />Simply stated, we must continue to conserve water wherever feasible if we are to satisfy the <br />commitments for water to cities, farms, and industries. But in order to conserve and in some in- <br />stances to salvage water necessary to meet these commitments, some of the environment must be <br />altered if benefits are to accrue to another segment. <br /> <br />Reclamation programs, present and future, relate c\irectly to people, Our major programs in the <br />past have been devoted chiefly to the development of Water for irrigation because this has been the <br />major thrust of our authorizing legislation. As the West continued to grow, other uses of water took <br />on new importance, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Today, in our affluent and complex society, we see a concern and a recognition by the very <br />people we serve that our natural resources are not unlimited. They recognize as do we that if we are <br />to retain a wide variety of natural habitat, we will have to make certain that the maintenance and <br />enhancement of environmental quality becomes an equa) partner of the multiple-purpose concept and <br />not relegate it to the role of a fringe benefit. <br /> <br />I was pleased to read in the Los Angeles Times some days ago, a story which represents both <br />sides of our river operation and maintenance work. The story emphasized the work being undertaken <br />for fish and wildlife protection and enhancement and recreational purposes. <br /> <br />The dollars programmed for this work represent 25 percent of the total cost and sometimes <br />more. For the next year, the principal thrust of our dredging program wilt be for fish and wildlife. <br />Our 20-inch dredge will be working in Cibola Lake, The 12-inch dredge will be in the Palo Verde <br />Division on the California side deepening these wate,rs for enhancement of the fishery habitat. <br />Another 12-inch dredge will be in Mittry Lake in Arizona for the same purpose. They meet the <br />pledges made by Reclamation in our various reports an~ discussions with the fish and game people of <br />Arizona and California. <br /> <br />A fourth dredge will be in the river above Imperial Dam clearing sediment that blocks the channel <br />to diversion works on bo~h sides of the river, The sediment is in the river at this point because we <br />could not get a large dredge to work upstream early enough to keep the sediment where it belongs, <br />That dredge is in the program for this fiscal year. ' <br /> <br />,4, <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.