Laserfiche WebLink
<br />L, M. ALEXANDER <br /> <br />It is our intent to monitor in the most representative way to assure that minimum concentrations <br />of concern which are now present remain low after plant start-up. Ultimately we plan to sample the <br />air quality at several of the historic sites to provide assurance that our contentions are correct. <br /> <br />2, Noise Abatement <br /> <br />Normally a plant of this kind is not relatively nejisy, But in the clear dry nighttime air in the <br />Page area, noise may traveL We will instruct the engine~r'constructor to incorporate noise suppression <br />in his plans for the plant. We have been assured that this can be done, without undue cost, <br /> <br />3. Water Quality <br /> <br />The temperature and quality of the water to be ret;urned to Lake Powell is another consideration, <br /> <br />plans call for installation of cooling towers to reduce the temperature of water used at the <br />facility, <br /> <br /> <br />An ecologist is beginning a study of data on stream flows, temperatures, stratification, and <br />depths to evaluate the best way and location to make the return flow. There is some thought that <br />the maximum 900 return temperature permitted to us under the water service contract will actually <br />be beneficial to fish and wildlife. <br /> <br />You may be sure we are fully conscious of th~ need to be sure that the effects of thermal <br />pollution are minimized, Our task is made much easier by the minimal amount of water that will be <br />returned-a maximum of 5900 A,F. per year in a lake' that has a present capacity of 11 million AF, <br />and a maximum capacity of 29 million A,F, <br /> <br />The remaining concern for water quality involves the quantity of solids contained in the water <br />which will be returned to the lake. We alreadY know th~t in comparison, the tons per year of dissolved <br />solids removed from the lake will be greater than the tons per year of dissolved solids returned, <br />Studies are being made on this subject too, so that we ican practically eliminate any adverse ecological <br />effects. ' <br /> <br />4. Dust Abatement <br /> <br />Improper handling of coal and ash can cause an undesirable local dust problem at the plant, We <br />will attack this proHem in several ways: <br /> <br />(a) cover and house all coal dumping and conveyqr and silo storage operations, <br />(b) provide means for dust collecting from cQvere:d apd housed areas. <br />(c) add 'vater to ~sh to stabilize it for transpo~tat\on to the ash disposal area some two miles <br />northeast of the plant, I <br />(d) cover ash with backfill at the disposal area to preyent blow away, <br />(e) maintain adequate housekeeping at all times, <br /> <br />5. Aesthetic Consideration <br /> <br />Slide 24 Power plants do not have to be ugly neighbors: These slides show current construction on a <br />nuclear and thermal plant which have both been enYirdnmentalized. We expect to do as much at <br /> <br />-28- <br /> <br />