My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02127
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02127
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:34:41 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:55:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8112.600
Description
Arkansas White Red Basins Interagency Committee - AWRBIAC
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
8/1/1976
Title
Technical Memorandum - State Regional Futures and Problem Lists -- Activity 2 Phase II -- 1975 National Assessment --- part 1 of 3 -- Cover Page - page 134
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />o <br />(..) <br />(P') <br />~ <br />.".,., <br />-..t <br /> <br />Instream flow needs must be viewed from the status of water laws, <br />existing interstate agreements, and established water rights in each <br />of the eight states. <br /> <br />Modifications of the riparian water rights doctrine dominate in the <br />.three eastern States of Arkansas, Louisiana, and Missouri. In these <br />states the needs of instream flows are met by natural free flowing streams <br />or by streams with structural works designed to regulate flows. These <br />structural measures may be constructed by federal, state, or local govern- <br />ments when there is a need, project justification, authorization, funding, <br />and concurrence or lack of objection by federal, state, and local interests. <br /> <br />In contrast variations of the appropriation doctrine dominate water <br />laws in the five States of Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and <br />Texas. The application of the appropriation doctrine varies in these <br />States. A few States do not recognize some of the listed instream flow <br />uses as beneficial uses because a water right does not exist, thus such <br />uses are considered incidental and subject to the established water rights. <br />Colorado, recently recognized the instream flow needs as beneficial uses, <br />but the uses are subject to established water rights which often account <br />for all the water supply of many streams. Thus, to establish a water right <br />under such circumstances may require purchase of an established right or <br />the development of a project which could hold over un-used flood waters <br />to support instream flow needs. <br /> <br />In New Mexico the flows available for instream use are dependent upon <br />State water rights, interstate compacts, and international commitments. <br />Incidental uses incliide-fisb, recreation, wildlife and esthetics. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.