Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />no 112 3 <br /> <br />Additional studies in the 1940's and 1950's culminated in a reconnaissance <br />report on the Yampa-White project in 1957. In 1959 local water interests <br />fonned the Yellow-Jacket Water Conservancy Oi strict (YJWCO), who now hol d <br />conditional water rights for levels of development conceived in the USBR plans <br />of 1957 a nd subsequent studi es completed in 1968. However, attempts through <br />1980 to obtain congressional projects authorization were unsuccessful. <br /> <br />In 19B1, renewed interest in water supplies for agricultural, municipal and <br />oil shale developments, was the basis for the State of Colorado to conduct the <br />Yellow Jacket Project Study; This study completed in 1982 presented yield <br />eval uati ons of proj ects util i zi ng the YJWCO water ri ghts and presented cost <br />estimates of alternative projects to deliver new supplies to potential users. <br />In the following year, the YJWCD and seven major private energy companies with <br />interest in regional oil shale development combined to direct the White River <br />Study. The White River Study examined potential multi-purpose water projects <br />that might employ the water rights of other entities in combination with YJWCO <br />water rights in an effort to reduce development costs and to mi nimi ze the <br />potentially damaging impacts of numerous, smaller, and scattered projects. <br /> <br />In the early 1980's several federal agencies conducted studies of water avail- <br />ability and potential water demands related to oil shale development in the <br />region. This included an investigation of yields of potential reservoirs in <br />the White River Basin. <br /> <br />The cornerstone of all the water resources projects fonnulated in the above <br />mentioned investigations is reservoir storage. It is not infrequent for fully <br />developed river basins in the Rocky Mountain region to require a total storage <br />capacity of two to three times the total annual average runoff. Thi s trans- <br />lates into a potential ultimate reservoir capacity development of 450,000 to <br />1,200,000 acre-feet within the White River Basin. The previous water planning <br />studi es were not di rected toward conducti ng subsurface geotechni cal i nvesti g- <br />ations at potenti al damsi tes. Gi ven the importance of reservoi r storage and <br />with the prominent dam and reservoir alternatives identified in the Yellow <br />Jacket Project and White River Study; the next logical step in the <br /> <br />1-2 <br />