Laserfiche WebLink
<br />visited the academies of science at these locations; their level of research <br />will compare with that of advanced western countries. In the Byelo- <br />russian) Lithuanian, Moldavian, Azerbaijan, Armenian, Kazakh, Uzbek~ <br />Turkmen, Tadzhik, and Kirgiz republics 152 universities and colleges with <br />320,000 students have been established. It is reported tbat there was not a <br />single school of higher education in those areas previous to 1917. lVlany of <br />the people in the Asian republics forty years ago were nomads. Today <br />these universities have their own scientists, trained in these colleges and <br />universities. <br />I was not in Russia nearly long enough to arrive at even a preliminary <br />appraisal of its educational system as a whole-how effectively its pro- <br />fessed aims are being carried out, and what the long-range results are likely <br />to be on the national life and thought. My guess is that, all things con- <br />sidered, we in the United States still are well ahead. But the signs of <br />rapid progress and continuing earnest effort to advance further aTe unmis- <br />takable in Russian education. <br />l\Jy impressions from the Geneva conference relate less to Switzerland as <br />a country than to a meeting place for currents of world thought and aspira- <br />tion. Political and social differences and barriers of language did not <br />prevent the scientists of many nations from making the meeting success- <br />ful-the first significant interchange of scientific information and ideas <br />in the postwar period. It was with obvious relief that they talked about <br />the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and the benefits they might bring to <br />people everywhere. From the start there was a dedicated) almost religious <br />atmosphere at the sessions. <br /> <br />I have thought a great deal about these experiences in different countries. <br />As fragmentary impressions of one man they are not, of course, an adequate <br />basis for definite conclusions. But they do form a pattern in which I find <br />much meaning. <br />The five countries are very different in their endowments of natural <br />resources, in density of population, in forms of government, in stages of <br />economic development and levels of education. But all of them in their <br />different ways are striving for higher levels of living and a more equitable <br />sharing of material benefits among their peoples. <br />This is a trend of great significance and promise. Charles P. Steinmetz, <br />one of our great engineers, said that civilizations of the past {ailed to sur- <br />vive because in no case did the majority of the people share in the benefits <br />of their civilization. Even Plato could not envisage a republic without <br />slaves. Steinmetz also said that our modern civilization might survive <br />because a civilization based on science and engineering has the unique <br />capacity to share its benefits with all of the people. What magic key do <br /> <br />5 <br />