My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02054
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02054
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:34:09 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:53:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - General Information and Publications-Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/26/1987
Title
Assessing Strategies for Control of Irrigation-Induced Salinity in the Upper Colorado River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />impacts in the agricultural sector were overstated and because of need to <br />discount for the multi-year lag between upstream salinity reductlon and <br />~ downstream water quality improvement, the realized benefits per unit of salt <br />~ <br />Cj removed are probably less than half that cla1med 1n the government's analysis.2 <br />U1 <br />Apply1ng thls result to so-called "structural" (public investment) solutlons to <br />mostly natural sallnity sources, only five of twenty proposed projects met <br />econom1c feasib1lity standards. <br />This art1cle extends our earlier analysis to non-structural <br /> <br />(lnstltutlonal) control approaches, and 1s an example of "analytical <br />lnstltutlonal economlcs" (Schmid). Rather than assumlng ex1stlng 1nstitutlonal <br />arrangements as given, the effects of chang1ng the rules of the game are <br /> <br />examlned. <br /> <br />(See also Randall). Pollcy lmpacts are assessed ln terms of <br /> <br />allocat1ve efflc1ency and how the beneflts and burdens of alternatlve control <br /> <br />programs are distributed. Allocatlve efficiency is measured accordlng to <br /> <br />conventlonal welfare econom1c crlteria; that is whether and to what degree <br /> <br />benef1c1arles' w11l1ngness to pay for favorable 1mpacts of a. strategy exceed <br />the willingness of part1es adversely affected to pay to avoid fts <br />1mplementat1on (M1shan). Alternative entltlement s1tuations are identlfied, <br />together w1th the lmplied llabllity or responsibllltles for bearlng the costs <br />of salin1ty damages and/or abatement' expenses. The dlstributlve lmpacts are <br />captured by estimat1ng the tangible econom1c effects on Upper Basin irrigators, <br />down-river water users, and the federal taxpayers. <br /> <br />The general approach 1s to first estimate the relative costs of <br />alternatlve on-farm irrlgatlon practices for reducing salt loading. Then, <br />several control strategies are identified and evaluated for cost- <br />effectiveness. Next, the net direct galns (losses) to the Basin economy are <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.