My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02054
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02054
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:34:09 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:53:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - General Information and Publications-Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/26/1987
Title
Assessing Strategies for Control of Irrigation-Induced Salinity in the Upper Colorado River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Economic Efficiencv of Alternative Control Stratecies. <br /> <br />The l1near program was first solved to establish the benchmark (no <br /> <br />~ salinity controll scenario (table 2, Part A, Row 1l. Annual net returns to land <br />~ <br />~ and water are an estimated $2,522,000 for the entire study area. This amounts <br />~ <br />to just over $50 per acre average net return. The base solution requires <br /> <br />222,250 acre-feet of irrigation water resulting in 237,350 tons of salt <br /> <br />discharged into the river via deep percolation and field ditch seepage. This <br /> <br />figure is similar to the earlier estimates of both SCS and Leathers and Young. <br /> <br />Policy instruments or strategies for reducing the emissions of water <br /> <br />pollutants include administratively-set incentives (subsidies or taxes), <br /> <br />marketable effluent permits and most commonly, direct controls on emitter <br /> <br />behavior (Bohm and Russell). Three basic types of control strategies were <br /> <br /> <br />tested: 1) irrigation system subsidies, 2) effluent taxes on salt discharges, <br /> <br />and 3l taxes on irrigation water, (ttinfluenttt taxes). <br /> <br />Var i ations and <br /> <br />combinations of these were also examined. <br /> <br />Def1n it10n of Net Social Cost. Net social cost of salinity control is <br /> <br />expressed in annual terms to include the annual ized capital cost of on-farm <br /> <br />imp rovements, plus income foregone from production changes, adjusted by <br />crediting the value of irrigation labor saved.6 Alternatively stated, net <br /> <br />costs to upstream farmers plus the government's cost equals the net social <br /> <br />cost. The cost to one group can exceed net social cost if the other group is <br /> <br />subsidized by the policy. <br /> <br />Net farm income foregone from production changes may include that from <br /> <br />cropp i ng pattern adjustments and land reti rement. The cost of add itional <br />overtime labor (based on the market wage rate) for irrigation is also a social <br />cost. Cap ital cost subs i dies and taxes on salt or water, however, are <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.