My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02044
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:34:06 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:53:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8126.700
Description
Arkansas River Coordinating Committee - Committees - Subcommittees
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
11/1/1973
Author
Water Resources Asso
Title
Salvage of Water due to Phreatophyte Clearing Shelton Farms Arkansas River Valley Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />30 miles. The continual grazing and trampling by the inmense herds of buffalo <br />Probably accounted for the openness of the understory. <br />By 1863, the users of the old Santa Fe Trail had removed practically all <br />of these trees. The resulting cover probably remained herbaceous or shrubby <br />because heavy grazing and other uses would tend to preVent development of a <br />woody tree or shrub cover. <br />In 1913. salt cedar was first reported (7) near Lamar as growing wild. <br />The flood of 1921 started the first extensive spread of this exotic species. <br />After a study of aerial photographs. Bittinger and Stringham (1) estimated <br />an average of 128 acres of phreatophytes per river mile between La Junta and <br />Las Animas in 1936. 154 acres per mile in 1947, and '183 acres per mile in <br />1957. The probable spread of phreatophytes is shown graphically on Figure 1. <br />Field Inspection Trip . <br />On September 26. 1973. Messrs. Beise. Thomson. Horton and Erickson. <br />representing the District; and Mr. Mendenhall. counsel for Shelton Farms, Inc., <br />visited the Shelton property and examined the areas included in the subject <br />application. <br />Examination of the cleared areas and inspection of the 1964 aerials indicate <br />that the vegetation cover was very similar to that described by Bittinger and <br /> <br />Stringham (1), even though that report covered only the area from La Junta to <br /> <br />Las Animas. and did not actually include the Shelton property. <br /> <br />Type Classification <br /> <br />Using the classifications of the Bittinger report (1), the CO'ier tIllS des- <br />cribed in the Augmentation Plan for Shelton Farms of August 23, 1972 as follows: <br />TYPe I - 33.8 acres <br />TYPettI - 68.0 acres <br />Open Water & Marsh ~ 28.0 acres <br />The average vegetation cover for Type I. according to Bittinger and Stringham, <br />was composed of 38...4' salt cedar and 13.9' cottonwood, with sane willow (see <br />Table 1). TypeUI has more salt.cedar (46.S\) with scattered trees (cotton- <br />wood 8.8'). <br />Some areas of the She 1 ton property, from inspection of the aerials, <br />should properly be classified as Type VII, *ich is composed of open herba- <br />ceous cover on bare ground. <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.