My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02042
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02042
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:34:05 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:53:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa General Publications - Correspondence - Reports
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
3/24/2000
Author
BLM
Title
Kremmling Resource Management Plan Amendments
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0)21;:'6 <br /> <br />environmental analysis, which would in turn require cultural inventory and identification of Native <br />American resources or areas of concern. <br /> <br />PRIME AND UNIQUE FARNfLANDS <br /> <br />Affected Environment: There are no prime or unique farmlands in any of the acquired parcels. <br /> <br />Environmental Consequences of Proposed Action: No prime or unique fannlands would be impacted by <br />the proposed action. <br /> <br />SOILS <br />(CoIOr:l.do Sundards for Public Land Health. Sundani #1) <br /> <br />Affected Environment: The Resource Management Plan discusses the soils of the North and Middle <br />Park Areas. During renewal of rangeland grazing permits, Land Health Standard # I was assessed on <br />parcels MP-3, MP-S, MP-6, MP-7, MP-ll, NP-2, and NP-3. An allotment specific discussion of the <br />soils is included in the environmental assessment written for each renewal. Most of the areas were <br />meeting Standard #1 except for portions of parcel MP-5 that had been vegetatively treated in the 1950s. <br />The remaining areas would be assessed during future grazing permit renewals or prior to other land use <br />actions. <br /> <br />Environmental Consequences of Proposed Action: All of the proposed land use priorities can be <br />compatible with soil resources. If specific projects or land actions are reviewed for best management <br />practices to reduce ercsion and protect soil resources, then impacts to soils can be minimized. A wildlife <br />designation in itself would not affect the acres within parcel MP-S that are not currently meeting Land <br />Health Standard #1. The proposed action would limit off-road vehicle use and reduce negative impacts <br />to soil reSOurces. The designation of these land use priorities does not represent a negative impact to soil <br />resources. <br /> <br />THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES <br />(Colorudo $landards for Public Land Health. Standnrd #4) <br /> <br />Affected Environment: Three of the acquired parcels, MP-2, MP-3, and MP-ll, support Federally listed <br />endangered plant species. The proposed protected area land use priority for these parcels is based on the <br />presence of the endangered plant species. All three parcels support populations of Osterhout milkvetch <br />(AstralZalus osterhoutii), and parcels MP-3 and MP-ll additionally support populations of Penland <br />beardlongue (Penstemon penlandii). <br /> <br />Environmental Consequences of Proposed Action: The protected area land use priority proposed for <br />parcels MP-2, MP-3, and MP-ll would establish these parcels as habitat for the continued existence of <br />.Osterhout milkvetch and Penland penstemon. The proposed action would limit off-road vehicle use on <br />these parcels. These actions would be beneficial. and perhaps necessary, to protect the plant populations. <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.