Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ . r . <br />. n~!'~~2' <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />larger parcels of private land. There is limited opportunity to affect management or apply <br />Standards for Public Land Health on these lands. Assessments for vegetative health have not <br />been conducted on these lands. <br /> <br />The lands between Kremmling and Reeder Creek are mostly private. There are two recent <br />acquisitions through land exchanges in this area. One of these, the Thompson property east of <br />Highway 9 along the Colorado River is irrigated and contains mostly riparian vegetation. The <br />other parcel near Reeder Creek allows access to the Colorado River, this parcel is also dominated <br />by riparian vegetation. <br /> <br />A portion of the Mayhoffer allotment south of county road 33 near the power substation was <br />assessed for Standards in 1998, as part of the grazing permit renewal process. The area included <br />in the proposed boundary was evaluated as not meeting the vegetation portion of Standard #3. A <br />change of grazing management on this allotment is being developed to improve vegetative health. <br /> <br />The upper end of the proposed boundary near Reeder Creek is included in the East Cedar Ridge <br />allotment. This allotment was assessed for Standards in 1998 as part of the grazing permit <br />renewal process. The area included in the proposed boundary is meeting the vegetation portion <br />of Standard #3, however, the occurrence of hounds tongue was noted and is targeted for <br />treatment. <br /> <br />Environmental Consequences of Proposed Action: <br />Management Prescription #1 (Boundary Adjustment): The adjustment of the boundary would not <br />directly impact vegetation in the proposed SRMA. <br /> <br />Management Prescription #2 (Identifying Land Use Priorities): The proposed action would <br />identify the majority of the SRMA as a recreation priority. The proposed action would <br />additionally establish or retain a water, soil, wildlife, protected, or no priority for some lands <br />within the SRMA. If expanding the recreation priority results in increased river access points, <br />dispersed camping, or development of access and parking areas for fishing, it may detrimentally <br />impact vegetative health. There is the potentia] that changing the Yarmony Common, Mayhoffer, <br />and East Cedar Ridge allotments from a livestock priority to a recreation priority would de- <br />emphasize the current vegetation management in the area and current use of the areas as forage <br />for livestock as well as cover and forage for wildlife. By adhering to the RMP, which provides <br />for intensive or limited management of livestock, as well as intensive management of wildlife <br />habitat in recreation priority areas, the priority change should not impact vegetative management <br />practices in the SRMA <br /> <br />Management Prescription #3 and #4 (NSO for oil and gas leasing, Land/Mineral Withdrawal): <br />These management prescriptions would eliminate activities that could potentially be detrimental <br />to the vegetative resource. <br /> <br />WASTES, HAZARDOUS OR SOLID <br /> <br />Affected Environment: <br />The BLM does not produce or dispose of hazardous wastes within the SRMA. <br /> <br />17 <br />