Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. t"SJ <br /> <br />state line. The flows storable in the potential Granada Reservoir would. <br />at times be limited by reservoir capacity and by the 200 secOlld-feet <br />capacity of the diversion canal.. Diversions to the reservoir would be <br />discontinued at such times as the river flows might be carrying heavy <br />sediment loads. <br /> <br />Reservoir operation <br /> <br />A reservoir. operation study has been prepared for the 3o-year <br />period 1921-1950, inclusive. The river flows for the years prior to <br />the operation of' John Martin Reservoir have been modified to show the <br />effects of the reservoir operation. For purposes of this study the <br />Granada Reservoir was assumed to provide .....'8.ter for the following useSI <br /> <br />1. Evap0ration from a permanent fish pool in both John <br />Martin and Granada Reservoir. <br /> <br />2. Replacement to John Martin Reservoir of depletions <br />resulting' from additional uSe of wator above the John Martin <br />Reservoir, specifically for tho depletions which would result <br />from operation of the Trinidad Reservoir.Prcject to reguJate <br />and conserve all flows of the Purgatoire River at the Trinidad <br />ReServoir site for uso on the potential Trinidad Project, as <br />described in the Trinidad Project Report ~ Appendix D, Irriga- <br />tion Repert, Purgatoire (Picketvdro) River Colorado Review <br />Report on Survey for Flood Control, June 1953, <br /> <br />3. Additional irrigation water Use below John Martin <br />ReServoir in both Colorado and Kansas. <br /> <br />It was assumed that the permanent fish pool in John Martin Reservoir <br />would be 7,500 acre-feet and in Granada Reservoir would bo 3,000 acre- <br />feet. These ;;J90ls would provide a minimum 8-foot dopth of water as <br />reconunended by the Color<ldo Game and Fish Dopartment. The depletions <br />to John Martin Reservoir resulting from the maximum operation of the <br />Trinidad Project would be replaced by exchango from Granada Resorvoir. <br /> <br />Additional irrigation use from Granada Reservoir was assumed to be <br />60 percent in Colorado and 40 percent in Kansas. Armual requirements <br />were varied by years in accordance vdth the requirements shown in the <br />recent John Martin Reservoir operational stud~es prepared by the Hydrc- <br />logy Subcommittee of the Oolorado AWR Cross Coordination Group. Addi- <br />tional use above Granada Reservoir could not physically be served <br />directly from the reservoir but would be accomplished by exchange with <br />the John Martin Reservoir. <br /> <br />The following basic assumptions of hydrologic conditions were used <br />in the reservoir operation study: <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />