Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OOIl/tI/ <br /> <br />'r <br />n <br />Cr-:" ,/ <br />~ " <br />e "J <br />;c 0 ~, I <br />',I <br /> <br />-lOd<j~pO"Q'". <br />----- SP'''''''''' <br /> <br /> <br />_II <br />. <br /> <br />-..1.-..' . <br />ro 40 60 80 100 <br />T""" ''''<f '~"t41 (,,'''"~lj,<'''l <br /> <br />. <br />". <br /> <br />. <br />,.. <br /> <br />Figure lO.-Projected waler yield IncreUe$ !rom specillc <br />management strategies in lodgepole pine and spruce-fir <br />lorests (leal and Aluander 1975). <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 11.-Mi..d conller loresls. including Douglas-Ilr In <br />the Southwest occuPY' about 400.000 acres In the lower <br />Cotor.do Rly.' B.sln. <br /> <br />o <br />, <br />. <br />. , <br />i 7 <br /> <br />: <br />, <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />, <br />5 ! <br />. <br />4 ! <br /> <br />; , <br />, , <br />, , <br /> <br />. <br />, <br />, , <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />, , <br />. <br />, 2 <br />, <br /> <br />2 ; <br />, <br />. <br />. <br />, <br />. <br />'" ",' <br />. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />,. .. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />'" '" <br /> <br />P"U"'Il'.o,."".d'"~"'"g, <br /> <br />Figur. 12.-PotenUal wate, yield incr.ases Irom mixed <br />conlle, fOftlsts .s. lunctlon oltha percenl 01 watershed <br />In openings 3 10 8 Ir.e heights in diameter and the ..- <br />peeted yield without II.atmenl (Rich and Thompson <br />1974). <br /> <br />spruce-fir (fig. 10) was similar. excppt thai the <br />patch cuts would he made at 50-year intervals. III <br />much of the Rod.y ~1()untain area. patch cutting is <br />considered ecologically sound if the management <br />objec!iv(! is to maintain the spruce-fir ecosystem <br />(Alexander 197.n t <br /> <br />Suuthwesh'Tll ~Jixed Conifer FOH~sts <br /> <br />~lix(~d conifer forests (fig. 11) in the Southwest <br />occupy sites thaI are welkr and cooler than usually <br />uccupied by pure stands of pondl'rosa pine and <br />wamwr, bul not necessarily drier, than subalpine <br />fowst sites 10 the north. The most common o\'er- <br />ShH~' species are rJouglas-fir. ponderosa pine, <br />whih! fir. Engelmann spruce. aspen, southwestern <br />white pine. bhw SprllC(!. and corkbark fir. ~1ost of <br />the mixed conifer stands aft! found be!\....een 7.000 <br />and 10.000 feet elevation. Aho\'e 10.000 feet. <br />mixt!d conifers gh'c way to spruce-fir forests. <br />Douglas-fir is the most important commercial <br />timber species. For purposes of this report. all <br />spruce-fir in the Lower Basin is included in the <br />mixed conifer type. Togt!thcr they occupy nearly <br />.tUU.DOO acres. mostly commercial. Precipitation <br />averages 25 10 more than 30 inches jwr \'eM; one- <br />half ur mOTe of it comes as soow. Water ~:ield aver. <br />ages J to 5 inch,'s. sometimes more on Ihn \\'t!tlesl <br />sites; three-fourths ur morn of il is from snowmelt. <br />Using management strategies similar to those <br />described for subalpine fowsts. the potential for <br />increasin!,: water yield in the mixed conifer forests <br />is t'stimatf>d to be about 25% tt!% than in the sub- <br />alpine. although large dparcuts apptMr 10 ~i\'e <br />greater increases in the mixt'd cunifer than in the <br />subalpine. :\ possible explanation for this is that in <br /> <br />10 <br />