My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01990
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP01990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:33:47 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:47:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.19
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/1/1996
Title
Information Publicly Available from the Bureau of Reclamation - Upper Colorado Regional Office - Proposals by Groups to Drain Lake Powell - Data on Impacts and Techinical Information
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />that is operating with the environmental constraints imposed by the recently completed Operation <br />of Glen Canyon Dam Environmt:ntallmpact Statement. a document developed with the <br />participation of the Sierra Club and other environmental groups along with water and power <br />users, recreational interests, and state and Iribal governments, <br /> <br />End of Response <br /> <br />Impacts of drawing down Lake Powell <br />to allow exposure of Glen Canyon <br /> <br />I - With respect to David Brower's concept to drain Lake Powell completely, the following can <br />be noted: <br /> <br />a - The spillway discharge tunnels, to which are connected the river bypass tunnels <br />used during construction, have a "flip bucket" elevation of 3 158 feet, <br />approx.lmately 14 feet below the original streambed elevation of 3172 feet at the <br />dam, and a tunnel bottom elevation of 3 134 feet near the flip bucket. The flip <br />buckets would likely be removed to allow free flow of both water and sediment <br />through the tunnel. Thus with the bypass tunnels open, the lake would be <br />completely drained, even the dead storage which cannot be released from the <br />hollow jet outlet tubes that were used for the spike flow test. <br /> <br />b - The river bypass tunnels have a diameter of 41 feet. With the concrete plugs <br />removed, the dam would function much like during the initial construction period <br />when the tunnels were used to bypass the entire Colorado River flow, Under an <br />assumption of non-pressurized, open channel flow, the tunnels have a combined <br />release capacity of about 100,000 cfs, Greater amounts could be discharged if <br />Lake Powell refilled enough to pressurize the tunnels (about 10 to 20 feet of <br />head), <br /> <br />c - Peak flows on the Colorado River at Lees Ferry typically occur in Mayor June and <br />have a broadly based shape, Statistical analysis revealed that the 1 DO-year peak <br />flows are about 155,000 cfs, the 20-year peak flows are about 125,000 cfs, and the <br />average peak flows are about 65,000 cfs, This means that the rive bypass tunnels <br />probably could pass all but about 10% of the flows in all years, Only yean such <br />as 1952, 1957, 1983. and 1984 would there be more water than the tunnels <br />could pass. In those cases, there would be some filling (10 to 20 feet) of the <br />reservoir, creating some head on the tunnel resulting in river flows of about <br />120,000 to 130,000 cfs. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.