My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01990
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP01990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:33:47 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:47:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.19
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/1/1996
Title
Information Publicly Available from the Bureau of Reclamation - Upper Colorado Regional Office - Proposals by Groups to Drain Lake Powell - Data on Impacts and Techinical Information
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Following is the text of a response by the Burean of Reclamation to David Brower's points <br />published by the Lake Powell Chronicle in January 1997: <br /> <br />Bureau of Reclamation response to the David Brower interview with the Lake Powell Chronicle, <br />Barry Wirth, Regional Public Atfairs Dtlker <br />January 17, 1997 <br /> <br />We have read with great interest the interview comments by David Brower, especially those <br />concerning the physical well being of Glen Canyon Dam and the loss of water from Lake Powell, <br /> <br />First, some thoughts concerning the safely of the dam, The single highest concern of the Bureau <br />of Reclamation is the safety of our facilities, In the absence of any quantifiable data, it is <br />, unconscionable to suggest that there are problems related to the safety of the dam that <br />Reclamation has declined to discuss or hidden from the public, The safety records of Glen <br />Canyon Dam, and all other 347 Reclamation dams, are a matter of public record, <br /> <br />The bottom line is, Glen Canyon Dam is safe and secure, The foundation is excellent. <br /> <br />The problem that Mr. Brower a\luded to related to the damage the two spillways sustained in <br />1983 following the passage of flood flows, Both spillways, which are lunnels around the dam <br />through the sandstone cliffs, were extensively damaged, Significant cavitation was created by the <br />vacuum effect of the water rushing through the tunnel. The problems occurred because the earlier <br />design of the spillways did not provide a means to dissipate the vacuum, not because of the <br />geology of the site, The spillways were completely redesigned and reconstructed with added air <br />intakes to prevent cavitation prior to the 1984 seasonal runoff Tests during that flood period <br />verified that the redesigned spillways would perform to the highest safety standards, <br /> <br />Reclamation has never hidden that event. In fact, it has been quite the opposite, We even <br />produced an award winning video on the reconstruction of the spillways, Challenge at Glen <br />Canyotlto this day remains one of our most popular videos distributed to the public, <br /> <br />As suggested by Mr, Brower, draining Lake Powell, "repairing" Glen Canyon Dam, and refilling <br />the reservoir some 100 years from now simply makes no sense since there is nothing wrong with <br />the dam in the first place, <br /> <br />Concerning Mr, Brower's comments on water loses from Lake Powell, there is no question that <br />there is water loss to evaporation and bank storage, That is a fact with any large body of water, <br />Here are the figures, as provided to the Sierra Club, <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.