My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Navajo Reservoir Operations Vol. II
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
Navajo Reservoir Operations Vol. II
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:33:38 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:46:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.105.I
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Navajo-Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/1/2002
Author
BOR
Title
Navajo Dam EIS-Draft EIS-Navajo Reservoir Operations-Volume II
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
446
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />II <br />II <br />I <br />'. <br />I <br />. <br />, <br />, <br />. <br />,II <br />, <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />II <br />I <br />II <br /> <br />Backwaters are an important habitat for young native fishes, including Colorado pikeminnow. <br />During studies of young stocked Colorado pikeminnow in the San Juan River, the fish were found <br />in backwaters 60% of the time, but they were found in other low-velocity habitats (e.g. pools, pocket <br />water) nearly 40% of the time. In the Green River, young Colorado pikeminnow are found in <br />backwaters more often than fish in the San Juan River, and studies have shown that the San Juan <br />River has relatively small amounts of backwaters compared with the Green and Colorado rivers. But <br />the success of the stocked Colorado pikeminnow in the San Juan River has shown that this system <br />has the habitats necessary for the survival and growth of these young fish. <br /> <br />Studies assessing the flows needed to build and maintain cobble bars and backwaters similar to those <br />used by Colorado pikeminnow were an important part of the 7-year research effort. These studies <br />showed that relatively high flows were needed to build and clean these habitats. but that lower flows <br />were needed to make them more abundant at the proper time of the year. <br /> <br />During the 7-year research period, a number of responses to the reregulation of Navajo Dam were <br />identified in the native fish community. Colorado pikeminnow young were found in very low <br />numbers, or not at all, during low spring runoff years, and in larger numbers during higher flow <br />years. The young of bluehead sucker and speckled dace, two other native species. were found in <br />greater numbers during high flow years compared with low flow years. Flannelmouth sucker. <br />another native species, tended to decline during the research period, but still remained the most <br />abundant native species in the river. The change to a more-natural hydro graph during the research <br />period resulted in more cobble and less sand habitats in the river, apparently favoring bluehead <br />sucker and speckled dace rather than flannelmouth sucker. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Nonnative fishes in the San Juan River are potential predators and competitors with the native <br />species and have been implicated in the decline of the native fishes throughout the Colorado River <br />Basin. Populations of some nonnative fishes changed during the research period, but no major <br />reduction in nonnative fish numbers were documented. Some authors have suggested that nonnative <br />fishes may be reduced by high natural flows, but this was not the case in the-San Juan River during <br />the 7 -year research period. Contaminants were also studied as a potential limiting factor for native <br />fishes. but no pattern of contaminant concentrations and flow was found. Table S. I summarizes the <br />biological and habitat responses that were found during the research period and the flows that were <br />important in producing those responses. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />FLOW RECOMMENDATlbN <br /> <br />RiverWare, a generic hydrologic model, was used as the primary modeling tool for developing the <br />flow recommendations. The model simulates the flow in the river at various gages at different points <br />in time, including the past, present, and future. It does this by incorporating all past, present, and <br />potentially future water development projects into the model. The 1929 to 1993 period of record was <br />used in the model to simulate flows under the various development scenarios. Existing gaging <br />stations were used to calibrate the model to ensure it was working properly for historic conditions. <br /> <br />SJRIP Biology Committee <br />May 1999 <br /> <br />5-3 <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br />Aow Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.