|
<br />Table 1. Summary of San Juan River Basin depletions for each alternatives. 9, 10
<br />
<br /> No Action 250/5000 500/5000
<br /> Alternative
<br /> acre-feetlvear
<br />Colorado Depletions
<br />Uostream ofNavaio Reservoir
<br />Upper San Juan 10,858 10,858
<br />Navajo-Blanco 7,865 7,865
<br />Piedra 8,098 8,098
<br />Pine River 71671 71671
<br />Subtotal 98,491 98,492
<br />Downstream of Navaio Reservoir
<br />Florida 28,607 28,607
<br />Animas 25,113 25,113
<br />La Plata 13,049 13,049
<br />Mancos 19,530 19,532
<br />McElmo Basin imports -11 769 -11 769
<br />Subtotal 74,530 74,532
<br />Animas-LaPlata Project 0 43,533 43,523
<br />Total Colorado depletions 173,021 216,557 216,546
<br /> ..
<br />Colorado and New Mexico combined depletion 648,163 827,119 825,306
<br />Utah deptetion 9,14OJ.7 9,1403.7 9,1403.7
<br />Arizona depletion 10,010 J 10,010 J 10,010 J
<br />Grand Total 667 13 846,269 844 456
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />1 Includes 10,600 acre-feetlyear (afy) of annual groundwa.ter storage. At equilibrium, the No Action Alternative drops to
<br />133,000 aty and the Action Alternatives drop to 270,000 aty, 10,600 atyfor the No AcUon Alternative Is probably .
<br />overstated.
<br />2 Accounts for 16,420 aty transferred from Hogback, Including the Hogback Extentlon, and Fruitland Projects to NIIP.
<br />3 Indicates otfstream depletion accounted for In calculated natural gains
<br />4 Water contract with the Jicarllla Apache Nation (Public Service of New Mexico)
<br />5 1,500 aty of depletion from minor depletions approved of SJRBRIP In 1992.
<br />6 3,000 aty of depletion from 1999lnter-$ervlce consultation, a portion of which may be in Colorado.
<br />7 1,705 aty Selin Juan River depletion, 7435 afy offstream depletion.
<br />8. The State of New Mexico does not necessarily agree with the depletions shown In tenns of constituting evidence of
<br />actual water use, water rights, or water availability under the Compacl The SJRBRIP Hydrology Committee uses a
<br />hydrology model disclaimer that reads In part "The model data methodologies and assumptions do not under any
<br />circumstances constitute evidence of actual water use, water rights. or water availability under Compact apportionments
<br />and should not be construed as binding on any party."
<br />9. The New MeXico Interstate Stream Commission (NMISC)and the San Juan Water Commission (SJWC) believe there are
<br />Inconsl6tencies In depletion calculations (communications from NMISC and SJWC dated April 8 and March 21. 2002,
<br />respecllvely).
<br />10 It should be noted that full development of State compact water and Indian trust water Is not included in this table.
<br />Onl existln 'em and ro'eets with ESA and NEPA c m Iiance are Included In the de letlon tab .
<br />
<br />A-IO
<br />
<br />.'
<br />
|