Laserfiche WebLink
<br />enough to fill their oontract if they were able. On the first <br /> <br />five years they could turn down enough to save it back the next <br /> <br />five. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: And you think that would be shouldering the <br /> <br />same burden as we? <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />MR. A. P. DAVIS: If they turn dO\om a full supply for say <br /> <br />seven or eight years and then two or three years of drought would <br /> <br />come whereby they couldn't turn down that amount of water after <br /> <br />storage is provided, these excess years would save the situation <br /> <br />during the dry ones, <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: Don't we predicate this whole operation on <br /> <br />the creation of storage in the lower basin? <br /> <br />MR. NORVEL: This is going further than I had anticipated. <br /> <br />The questions I asked were for enlightenment only on the language <br /> <br />and we are getting further a"my from what I had in mind, The <br /> <br />'f' <br /> <br />other discussion is very enlightening. I am very glad to hear <br /> <br />.'" <br /> <br />it, but it should come in a general discussion. <br /> <br />MR. A. P. DAVIS: The percentage of inflow below Lee's <br /> <br />Ferry in the compact Mr. Carpenter has presented, is assumed to <br /> <br />be 14, I am not informed of any figures on which they can be <br /> <br />based, possibly Mr, Meeker could enlighten us on that point. <br /> <br />l, <br /> <br />As I take it, the Gila furnishes about 6% of the flow and some <br />other percentage is furnished below Lee's'FerrJ. In my report <br />you will find 14% taken as including a lot of small streams, <br /> <br />but it includes three in~ortant streams above Lee's Ferry, so <br /> <br />12th _ S.F. <br />21 <br /> <br />91 <br />