My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01961
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01961
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:33:34 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:46:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/12/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #12
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />of the area of the reservoirs that might be used either at <br /> <br />Boulder Canyon or at Glen Canyon. They 1dou1d not have any <br /> <br />very different results. I think I might take Boulder Canyon as <br /> <br />a tyPe and with, say, 16,000,000 acre feet which would be a <br /> <br />necessary storage to entirely control the river outside of any <br /> <br />flood control considerations, that \>Tould e'xpose to evaporation, <br /> <br />an area of 80,000 acres. <br /> <br />HR. NORVIEL: And the evaporation per annum ;lOu1d be hO'-I <br /> <br />many acre feet'! <br /> <br />MR. A. P. DJevIS: I suppose we might assume about six feet. <br /> <br />That reservoir would not be full, of course, all the time. In <br /> <br />fact, under normal conditions, \>Te are assuming it would be ap- <br /> <br />proD.ching emptiness. But ue are safe in taking it at 6 feet. <br /> <br />Assuming about one_half of it would be exposed, that would be <br /> <br />about 240,000 D.ore feet per annum. <br /> <br />MR. CARPENTER: Hith respect to any reservoirs constructed <br /> <br />in the Upper area, there \>Tou1d be evaporation there also, and <br /> <br />that would automatically be cared for and deducted under this <br /> <br />plan 1;i thout any figuring. <br />MR. A. P.' DAVIS: That is true. This compact requires, <br /> <br />hOHever, that the 10we~' basin stand the loss from either Lee 1 s <br /> <br />Ferry, or anything belou it. <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: I am just endeavoring to ascertain the <br /> <br />approximate loss. You speak of a dam creating a reservoir with <br /> <br /> <br />a capacity of 16,000,000 acre feet. under this compact - this <br /> <br />form of draft ~ the lower states or basin uou1d be chargeable <br /> <br />for all the \>Tater that passes Lee's Ferry. In such a <br />12th - S,F. <br />18 <br /> <br />reservoir <br /> <br />88 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.