My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01961
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01961
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:33:34 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:46:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/12/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #12
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />from Mr, Grover who is the Chief Hydrographer of the Geological <br /> <br />Survey, on inflow. It isn't complete, but I can allow for the <br /> <br />lack, Mr. Grover estimates the ~aria River an average flow of <br />60,000 acre feet; Kanab Creek, 30,000; Little Colorado River, <br /> <br />200,000; Virgin River, 233,000; Williams River 75,000, These <br /> <br />are most of them based upon meagre measurements and while in- <br /> <br />di'lidua11y I would from my own m'j'mory make some corrections,I <br /> <br />would arrive at nearly the same conclusion as Mr, Grover does, <br /> <br />excepting that he has entirely omitted all of the areas except <br /> <br />those five streruns while they include only about 2/3 of the <br /> <br />drainage area, To complete it on the same basis, assuming that <br /> <br /> <br />the little streams not included in these five principal streams, <br /> <br />flow at the same average per square mile, it would bring the <br /> <br />amount up to just a little over 1,000,000 acre feet, which is <br /> <br />practically the same as our estimated l~sses, before any fifty- <br /> <br />fifty proposition was suggested ,between Boulder Coo1yon and Yuma. <br /> <br />I think probably the 1500 secon4 feet loss between Boulder and <br /> <br />Yuma was large but certainly the excess was not more than <br /> <br />enough to balance the rest of the canyon. The losses in the <br /> <br />canyon are relatively small, and the losses belml are great <br /> <br />because of the broad expanse covered by water. <br /> <br />MR. NORVmL: Mr. Davis, one more question, Assuming you <br /> <br />have read this compact, or heard it read, and understand its <br /> <br />purports, does it contemplate ~ecessari1y the construction of <br /> <br />a. large dam in the lower river and the storage of ~~ter and <br /> <br />stabil:Lzing the flow of the river in order that the lands in the <br /> <br />12th _ S.F. <br />16 <br /> <br />86 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />86 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.