Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. traveling along a river already full, so to speak. You would <br /> <br /> <br />on~y increase the \'Tater and you have your evaporation losses <br /> <br /> <br />anyhow. . <br />MR.. NORVIEL; Well, that is. argument, but the question Has, <br /> <br />is there to be an estilnate made of the evaporation losses be- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />tween Lee's Ferry and the point of diversion, <br /> <br />~IR. CARPE~ITER: Yes sir, that was. thought of, considered <br /> <br />and discussed between mwse~f and Mr. Meeker to considerable length. <br /> <br />And as I stated at first, it \;as t,houc;ht the pOHer benefits in <br />that additional amount of Hater Hould more than offset the <br /> <br />evaporation lOss. <br /> <br />. ~IR. NORVIEL; That would perhaps bdng a~other thought in <br /> <br />that connection, It is your intention then" that whatever the <br /> <br />evaporation loss and loss by peroolation of the one-half you <br /> <br />propose to. deliver to Nexico, sh8,ll be made up from the water <br /> <br />you .turn do"m j.n the amount that you have specified or propose <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />to sp~cify. <br />MR. CARPElITER: It \'0uld presumably, <br />MR. NORVIEL: There would be a recognition of the existing <br />rights of appropriation or a profision made for these rights? <br /> <br />MR. CAPJ'ElITER: No. It was' thought unnecessary. I might <br /> <br />say, there that ,whatever structurfjS are built, for exa~le, in <br /> <br />.the Upper Division would naturally be subject to existing rights <br /> <br />there. Whatever diversions and ~ppropriations are made in the <br /> <br />LOHer Division would naturally b~ subject to the existing rights <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />,. , <br /> <br />12th - S,F. <br />10 <br /> <br />80 <br /> <br />80 <br />