My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01948
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01948
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:33:31 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:46:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP Annual Report
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
4/9/2003
Author
UCRBRIP
Title
2002 Annual Reports Package Part 2
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM <br />FY 2002 ANNUAL REPORT <br /> <br />RECOVERY PROGRAM <br />PROJECT NUMBER: C-6bt <br /> <br />I. Project Title: <br /> <br />Evaluation of middle Green River floodplains for the restoration of bony tail. <br /> <br />II. Principal Investigators: <br /> <br />Tim Modde, Biologist <br />U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />266 West 100 North Suite 2 <br />Vernal, UT 84078 <br />(435) 789-0354; Fax (435) 789-4805 <br />tim _ modde@fws.gov <br /> <br />Kevin Christopherson <br />Utah Division of Wildlife Resources <br />152 E. 100 N. <br />Vernal, UT 84078 <br />Phone: (435)789-3103; Fax (435) 789-8343 <br />E-mail: KevinChristopherson@utah.gov <br /> <br />III. Project Summary: <br /> <br />Little is known of bony tail Gila elegans life history. Even the question of what habitats <br />they occupied is unclear. Prior to mainstem impoundments bonytail were widespread among the <br />larger rivers of the Colorado River basin (Jordan and Evermann 1896). Although the most recent <br />captures of bony tail in the upper Colorado River basin were made in high gradient, canyon <br />reaches (summarized by Valdez et al. 2001), historical records suggest bony tail may have been <br />more abundant in alluvial reaches. <br /> <br />Among the large river fishes in the Colorado River basin, the bony tail has responded to <br />altered habitats in a manner more similar to the razorback sucker than other native species. <br />Unlike the Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub or roundtail chub, both the razorback sucker <br />and bony tail are able to survive and reproduce in artificial impoundments. In addition, both <br />species seem to have flexible spawning requirements, having successfully spawned on gravel <br />bars or wind-swept gravel shorelines, and in ponds with little or no gravel substrate without flow. <br />If life history needs are similar to razorback sucker, then habitat restoration efforts being planned <br />for razorback sucker will also benefit bony tail. Although the current bony tail stocking plan for <br />the state of Utah specifies riverine stocking (Lentsch et al. 1996), the Colorado bony tail stocking <br />plan recognizes the potential need of floodplain habitat to restore bony tail (Nesler 1998). <br /> <br />C-6bt page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.