Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o n l,J ~i 7 <br />.... <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Colorado Field Supervisor <br />United States Fish and Wildlife Service <br />July 21, 1997 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />. Mouse population and range: The Mouse hibernates for seven months <br />beginning in September and is nocturnal during its few months of activity. <br />Therefore identifying the location and numbers of mice is difficult at best. <br />Maps issued by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service ["Service'l <br />purportedly designating Mouse and habitat location have significant, <br />inexplicable gaps such as those between Longmont and Laramie where there <br />is no significant change in habitat. A five year, intensive trapping program <br />would provide a credible population and range identification for the Preble's <br />meadow jumping mouse. Listing should be delayed, and lawful activities <br />continued, until there is sufficient, reliable information on which to make a <br />decision. <br />. Relic population: There is some question whether the Mouse is a relic <br />population which has existed in low density numbers for an extended period <br />oftime. Recovery of a relic population is a misnomer, and perhaps protection <br />of existing populations is all that is required, <br />. Water flows: The Federal Register notice dated March 25, 1997 proposing <br />listing of the Mouse contained several hypotheses regarding water <br />development and operation and decline of the Mouse, The Service has failed <br />to prove the nexus between water flows and the population numbers of the <br />Mouse. Funher study needs to be conducted regarding the Mouse population <br />and water development so any information and suppositions are scrutinized <br />prior to the potential harsh impacts from listing, The Service must prove how <br />water depletion is cOMected to the decline of the species prior to publishing <br />unsubstantiated hypotheses regarding water and the purported decline of the <br />Mouse. <br /> <br />2, If the Mouse is listed, it should be as ''warranted, but precluded", and allow the <br />State of Colorado and local government entities to head up a recovery program. <br />The listing proposal is incorrect in stating only the federal government can protect <br />the species, In November of 1995. Colorado and the federal government signed a <br />Memorandum of Understanding regarding candidate or declining species <br />providing for flexible recovery management. The Y1emorandum is working well <br />concerning the stabilization and recovery of the boreal toad, another species <br />presumably heading for a threatened or endangered listing. Public and private' <br />entities are in the process of contracting with the state to create natural areas to <br />preserve and enhance toad habitat, There is no reason to believe this type of <br />response which has worked so well for recovery of the boreal toad would not be <br />equally effective in addressing [he needs of the Preble's meadow jumping mouse. <br />