Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~. <br />>. <br />~~ <br /> <br />0::27J1 <br /> <br />titudy 1] <br /> <br /> <br />liii1 <br />.,W <br />i." <br />, . <br /> <br />This study is an evaluation of the apparent salvage .in the Colorado lliver <br />abovs the station at Glemlood i;;prings because of tl'tlnsmotintain div-ersions for <br /> <br />:.~ <br />:~. <br />~'; . <br />V,.. <br />:~ <br />,~ <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />:~ <br />:~ <br />;1 <br /> <br />, <br />'Rl <br />'~ <br />,; <br />) <br />:6 <br />[0.. <br />: <br />n. <br />, <br /> <br />a historic period 1911 thru 1954, utilizing the :iix Index Supply Stations of <br />Study A and the.. Index Stations on !Ii[91i1'icant tributariel/ below Hot Sulphur . <br />I <br /> <br />Springs' as explained in Study II. <br /> <br />The station for the l!:agle River was <br /> <br />at Redcliff. The graphs and oorrelations developed are filed under Study <br />II. ;. plot using a base line drnvm thz'OUf:h points, for 1911 thru 1935, of <br />Index Supply versus Colorado Hiver at Glenwoocl :iprings, and later years <br /> <br /> <br />shov.n with acoountAble and unncoolmt.1ble depl~tions by water years is also <br /> <br />shown. Unaccountable depletions, or apparent salvage , occurs with few ex- <br /> <br />ceptions, however, the inconsistenoy of' the magnitude 01' this salvage was <br /> <br />believed , in part, due to the Engle raver station at Hecliff not measuring\\ <br />a large eno,:\Gh portion of the total tributary flow of the Eaglet liivor. <br />For this reason the station of i!.agle l!iver below Gypsum VIas used Wlstead of <br />at Redoliff, and the renults are suwnarized under Study II. <br /> <br /><I <br /> <br />I <br />:i' <br />"'" <br /> <br />'(-"',- <br /> <br />, . <br /> <br />m <br />fJ;1 <br />..~ <br /> <br />..\:.". <br /> <br />[] <br />'[j <br /> <br /> <br />w <br />~ <br />