Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />Colorado River. The Colorado River endangered fishes adapted to a riverbed <br />with areas of silt, sand, gravel, and cobble. Gravel and cobble bed parts of <br />the channel, especially riffles, are essential for spawning. Sand and silt <br />bed parts of the channel, especially backwaters, are utilized extensively by <br />larval and juvenile fishes. Andrews (1986) indicates that either aggregations <br />that results in an all sand bed channel. or degradation that results in an all <br />gravel bed channel would eliminate essential habitat for the endangered fish. <br />Lamarra, et al. (1985) concluded that well-washed course substrate (cobble) <br />with interstitial voids that contain little or no organic matter may be a <br />critical factor in determining the preferred reproductive sites of Colorado <br />squawfish. Consequently, the Service evaluated the effect of the Ruedi III <br />Green Mountain water sales on: (1) the channel stability of the IS-mile reach <br />and (2) the flows required to maintain substrate conditions suitable for <br />Colorado squawfish spawning in the IS-mile reach. <br /> <br />Channel Stability <br /> <br />The IS-mile reach is currently in equilibrium with regard to sediment <br />transport. Simons (1983) indicates that flow regulation from previous <br />projects, geologic controls, and the gravel, cobble, and boulder bed nature of <br />the stream have resulted in a channel that is stable over an engineering type <br />timeframe (on the order of 100 years). Lyons (1986) confirms that conclusion <br />through inspection of aerial photographs for 1954, 1980, and 1986. The river <br />channel is oversized for the present flow regime, and the armoring which has <br />occurred significantly reduces the opportunity for degradation during high <br />flow events. Bank erosion on the north bank has been balanced with island <br />formation to maintain overall channel width and depth dimensions. Based on <br />this information, changes in flows as a result of Ruedi Round II/Green <br />Mountain water sales will not affect the stability of the channel in the <br />IS-mile reach. <br /> <br />Substrate Flushing Flows <br /> <br />Simons (1983) indicates that the sediment transport capacity of the stream <br />with the present flow regime greatly exceeds the available sediment supply. <br />Even so, there are flows at which sediment will settle and fill the voids in <br />the cobble substrate. The Service believes fine sediments may be deposited on <br />cobble areas within the IS-mile reach that require periodic flushing to <br />provide suitable spawning conditions. <br /> <br />The Service has utilized methods recommended by Milhous (1986) to determine <br />the flows that may be required to assure adequate flushing of fine sediments <br />from cobbles in this reach. The methods and analyses are presented in <br />Appendix B. Within the constraints of the data available only a broad range <br />of flushing flows (between 10,000 and 20,000 cfs) could be determined. Once <br />these discharges have been attained, only a few hours are required to flush <br />