My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01912
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01912
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:33:22 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:44:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.129.D
Description
Upper Gunnison Project
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
3/1/1964
Author
USDOI - BOR
Title
Reconnaissance Report - Upper Gunnison Project-Colorado - March 1964
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />00 <br />o <br />lr:l <br />.-.j <br /> <br />SYNOPSIS <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />This report appraises three scales of development--comprehensive, in- <br />termediate, and small--as indications of future water resource potentiali- <br />ties for the Upper Gunnison River Basin in west-central Colorado. The re- <br />port shovs that development in the basin would be economically justified <br />and future feasibility investigations are warranted. Of the plans appraised <br />the small development appears to be the most desirable but additional stu~ <br />is required before a definite plan of development can be selected. <br /> <br />The three developments outlined in this report have been appraised as <br />potential participating projects of the Colorado River Storage project. <br />The comprehensive and intermediate developments would provide for irriga- <br />tion, hydroelectric power production, fish and wildlife, and recreation. <br />The small development would serve all of these purposes except power pro- <br />duction. Under the comprehensive plan irrigation would be provided for <br />both existing and new farm units while in the other plans irrigation would <br />be provided only for presently irrigated lands and undeveloped areas that <br />could be farmed in conjunction with existing units. Pertinent data on the <br />three plans are summarized below. <br /> <br /> Comprehensi ve Intermediate Small <br /> development development development <br />Irrigation service area (acres) <br />Full service 26,560 15,580 7,490 <br />Supplemental service 19.010 18 .690 17.760 <br />Total 45,570 34,270 25,250 <br />Power development <br />Installed capacity (kw.) 22,200 22,200 <br />Average annual generation <br />(1,000 kw.-hrs.) 76,236 76,236 <br />Costs <br />Construction costs $41,603,800 $36,720,900 $7,079,500 <br />Annual operation, mainte- <br />nance, and replacement costs $178,600 $170,200 $65,040 <br />Benefits <br />Total benefits $2,132,200 $1.757.200 $683,400 <br />Direct benefits $1.601.200 $1.421.200 $441.700 <br />Benefit-cost ratios <br />Total benefits 1. 29 : 1 1.20:1 2.05:1 <br />Direct benefits only 0.97:1 0.97:1 1.32:1 <br /> <br />For each of the three plans analyzed, construction costs allocated to <br />irrigation could be paid in 50 years from payments by the irrigators. ad <br />valorem tax revenues, and revenues from the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />Fund. At present rates for sale of Colorado River Storage project power. <br />payment of power construction costs would require about 60 years under the <br />comprehensi ve plan and about 68 years under the intermediate plan. Under <br />House Resolution 9032. 88th Congress. all recreation and fish and wildlife <br />construction costs of the comprehensive development would be nonreimburs- <br />able. A portion of the fish and wildlife and recreation construction costs <br />of the intermediate and small developments would be reimbursable and some <br />means for paying these costs would be required. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.