Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />process lines. This water may contain large quantities of ammonia, carbon <br />dioxide, phenols, and other organics. <br /> <br />In most conversion processes, the condensate wastewater is so contam- <br />inated that its release to the environment in any form is unacceptable. <br />Therefore, it is likely that treated condensate will be used as make-up <br />to a cooling tower. The cooling tower blowdown then becomes the principal <br />discharge point for the whole plant. This blowdown will contain, in addi- <br />tion to concentrated salts, residues of organic matter originating in the <br />coal reactor. <br /> <br />There are a number of ways to dispose of the blowdown streams from <br />boiler feedwater treatment and cooling towers. Impoundment in lined evapo- <br />ration ponds is the most probable method. Another method is to wet dawn <br />the coal ash with the concentrated blowdown. In some instances, the cooling <br />tower blowdown might have to be treated to reduce organic contamination <br />before it could be used to wet down the coal ash. <br /> <br />It is estimated that wastewater control for a coal gasification plant <br />would cost (on an annualized basis) anywhere from about 3 to 20 cents per <br />million Btu of product depending upon the particular treatment and disposal <br />options employed and the quality of the waste streams handled. By way of <br />comparison, the total cost of producing a high-Btu pipeline quality gas <br />is estimated to be $3 to $4 per million Btu. <br /> <br />Surface Retorting of Oil Shale. Two different water management schemes <br />were analyzed for an oil shale conversion comples in which surface retort- <br />ing occurs. In one scheme, the processed shale is moisturized with all of <br />the wastewaters generated in the plant, and then some. Thus, the only treat- <br />ment that would be required would be to remove odorous, volatile substances <br />The cost of this treatment is estimated to range anywhere from about 1 to <br />3 cents per million Btu of product. <br /> <br />In the second scheme, a valley would be lined with a thin, imperme- <br />able layer of compacted spent shale that is wetted down. The remainder <br />of the spent shale would be deposited into the lined basin and compacted, <br />but not wetted down except for controlling dust. Since this second scheme <br />would require very little water for moisturization purposes, retorting <br />and upgrading wastewaters would have to be treated for recycling and reuse <br />within the plant. In this regard, it was assumed that the wastewater would <br />be treated for use in a cooling tower in a manner similar to that for a <br />coal gasification plant. <br /> <br />For this second scheme, the estimated costs (on an annualized basis) <br />of wastewater management would run anywhere from about 1.5~ to 3~ per <br />million Btu of output. By way of comparison, the total cost of producing <br />crude shale oil is estimated to be in the range of at least $2.50 to $3.00 <br />per million Btu. <br /> <br />1-17 <br />