Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />The main importance of weather modification to EETs is that their <br />relatively junior surface water rights would yield more reliable water <br />supplies than would otherwise he the case. This would occur because more <br />flow, primarily between April and July, would be available to junior <br />appropriators, tbereby enabling them to fill reservoirs more consistently <br />or to avoid being shot off as often as would normally be the case. The <br />other important aspect of weather modification is that it could conceivably <br />alleviate situations in which EET development 'in anyone State might be <br />con~trained by compact considerations. <br /> <br />Improvements in the Efficiency of Water Use by Others <br /> <br />Another means of supplying water to EETs is improvements in the <br />efficiency of use by non-EET uses. This alternative is a potential source <br />of supply in that reductions in the projected demand for water ror non- <br />EET uses would effectively increase the supply of surface water remaining <br />for EETs. <br /> <br />Municipal Uses. Within the Upper Basin itself, municipal uses are <br />projected to account for less than 2 percent of future depletions. Any <br />reductions in consumption by imprOVing the efficiency of municipal use <br />would be insignificant. The greater opportunity for reducing depletions <br />of Upper Basin surface water supplies lies in improving the efficiency <br />of use in the urban areas outside of the Upper Basin which import at least <br />a portion of their supplies from the Upper Basin. <br /> <br />For example, if one assumes no municipal recycling 'of water and a <br />20 percent reduction in per capita use by only that increment of popula- <br />tion growth that is the basis of projected increases in transbasin ex- <br />ports, a reduction of 60,000 to 80,000 acre-feet per year in projected <br />exports could be achieved. This is a higbly conservative estimate. If <br />one takes into account the fact that techinques to reduce per capita <br />consumption would apply to all customers, not just projected increments <br />of population growth (i.e., new customers), then exports for municipal <br />use could be reduced by perhaps as mucb as 200,000 to 300,000 acre-feet <br />per year. If recycling were employed or if reductions in per capita <br />consumption exceeded 20 percent, exports could be reduced by even larger <br />amounts. The important a~pect of potential r.eductions in exports insofar <br />as water availability for EETs is concerned is that such reductions could <br />alleviate possible compact constraints on the consumption of water by <br />EETs. The physical availability of water is not likely to be significantly <br />affected by reductions in exports since tbe subbasins most likely to <br />experience major EET developme~t (i.e., tbe White River Basin in Colorado <br />and Utah) are not tbe source of projected exports. <br /> <br />~9 <br />