Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Metropolitan Water Supply Investigation Proposal <br />Hydrosphere, Inc. <br /> <br />Septmber 17, 1993 <br />Page 36 <br /> <br />municipal water users in Boulder and Weld County. This project grew out of an assessment of <br />municipal and industrial water supply needs within the existing District and its currently <br />contemplated service area only. As a part of this effon the District has developed a great deal <br />of information on existing municipal water supplies and future needs, alternative pipeline <br />routes, sizes, costs and environmental impacts. Design of the SWSP is expected to be <br />completed in the summer of 1993 and construction is expected to begin in 1994. <br /> <br />While the sizing and alignment of the proposed pipeline is based on the needs and <br />financial capabilities of current project participants only, the easements associated with the <br />proposed pipeline have been sized by the District in anticipation of an additional pipeline at <br />some future time. In doing so the District has recognized the possibility that more <br />comprehensive front range water management needs could be served in the future by additional <br />conveyance capacity from Nonhero Colorado to the metro Denver area. However, the District <br />has not studied such future potential, and its current policies do not contemplate the use of <br />water from CBT, Windy Gap or Nonhero "base supply" south of Boulder and Weld Counties. <br /> <br />The MWSI Project should consider a wide range of options which may involve the use <br />of Nonhero Colorado water supplies and project facilities in meeting Front Range water <br />management issues while keeping in mind the legitimate interests of Nonhero Colorado. In <br />doing so, the MWSI Project should solicit the active involvement of Nonhero Colorado <br />representatives. <br /> <br />Araoahoe County Utility Advisory Board Studies - Water Providers in Arapahoe County <br />have organized through a County-formed Utility Advisory Board since early 1990. This <br />Utility Advisory Board was charged with investigating new plans of water supply development <br />in view of the failure of Two Forks. Water providers in Arapahoe County participated in <br />approximately 18.5% of the Two Forks project and the economic development that has begun <br />to occur over the last 18 months highlights the need to find new supplies to replace the Two <br />Forks supplies that would have been delivered to the County. <br /> <br />The Utility Advisory Board focused in on the County's very significant groundwater <br />supply as a source of meeting those demands. Currently some 32 million acre-feet of <br />groundwater exists under Arapahoe County in the non-tributary aquifers of the Denver Basin. <br />Under Senate Bill 5 the providers in the County could potentially withdraw some 320,000 <br />acre-feet of groundwater a year. Studies of the groundwater by the Utility Advisory Board <br />have recommended that consideration be given to producing 30,000 acre-feet of groundwater <br />annually to meet projected demands for approximately a 50 year period. <br /> <br />Rather than depletion of the groundwater resource over time, the Utility Advisory Board <br />has considered the potential "conjunctive use" of these groundwater supplies with surface water <br />supplies derived from the mountains. The conjunctive use scheme that was developed would <br />utilize the groundwater supplies only in periods of drought. The groundwater system that is <br />developed would then serve as a sland alone system component that could deliver 30,000 acre- <br />feet of water supply to Arapahoe County in any year as required by drought. <br /> <br />The Arapahoe County Util ity Advisory Board has approached the Denver Water <br />Department with a plan to conjunctively use their groundwater with the surface water supplies <br />of the Denver Water Department. While the firm yield of the Denver Water Department is <br />currently about 300,000 acre-feet annually, the average yield in the Denver system is over <br />400,000 acre-feet. The Arapahoe County groundwater system could potentially be another <br />component of the Denver system, allowing the Denver Water Department to change its <br />operational scheme to increase the firm yield of their system hy 30,000 acre-feet. Hence, in <br />periods of excess water supply in the mountains, that excess supply would be delivered to <br />