Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-" <br /> <br />001738 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />indicates reduction of ammonia levels by biological processes. <br />Reduction downstream might be less marked in the winter, but we <br />do not know this. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Although one of the documents supplied to me (Weuthele <br />1976) indicated that Coal Creek degrades Boulder Creek with <br />respect to ammonia, I do not find this well supported by the <br />data for summer of 1980, as the unionized ammonia levels on <br />the two sampling occasions were as low or lower than expected <br />in Boulder Creek from the STORET data. Weuthele's data were <br />taken in winter, however, when the situation may have been <br />different. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Conclusions Concerning the Aquatic Fauna of Coal Creek. <br />Since the ammmonia standard is based almost exclusively on <br />ammonia tolerance of fishes, and since no information seems to <br />exist on tIle invertebrates of Coal Creek, the conclusions here <br />apply to the fish fauna only. It is generally believed that <br />the unionized ammonia of running waters is more dangerous to <br />fish than to any other component of the fauna (EIFAC 1973), <br />although this has not been studied very carefully. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The informat ion I have on fish is from three sources: <br />(1) information from the U.S, Water and Power Resources <br />Service gathered in fall of 1979 at various locations along <br />Coal Creek, (2) State of Colorado, Stream Classification <br />Survey Forms for Boulder Creek and Coal Creek, and (3) <br />electroshocking on 11 June 1980 above and below the Louisville <br />discharge for the specific purpose of obtaining current <br />information on the fish composition in Coal Creek around <br />Louisville (see attachment 2). Wherever fish are found in Coal <br />Creek or in Boulder Creek near its confluence with Coal Creek, <br />the fish fauna is typically dominated by three species: (1) <br />the creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus), (2) the fathead <br />minnow (Pimephales promelas), and (3) the stoneroller <br />(Campostoma anomalum). In selected locations the longnose dace <br />(Rhinichthys cataractae) and the white sucker (Catostomus <br />commersoni) appear in reasonably large numbers. The green <br />sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus) appears in very limited numbers, as <br />do a few other species, Boulder Creek beyond 75th Street <br />and Coal Creek throughout most of its length are too warm for <br />trout except perhaps if the stream is impounded. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Although a rather unified picture of species composition <br />is given by the three different fish collections, the <br />collections, and particularly most recent sample on Coal <br />Creek, SllOW some radical difference between sites in the <br />abundance of fish. Beginning at a point several kilometers <br />above the Louisville discharge (see attachment 2), fish are <br />abundant and show evidence of being healthy and in good <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />