Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(NOTE: Top half of this page omitted from photostatic copy) <br />MR. CALD\.lELL: In each division? <br /> <br />MR. CARPEN'rER: Of course the provision respecting the <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />navigation overlaps both divisions. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: This would be a correct statement. Use <br /> <br />within state boundaries to be based on state laws subsequent <br /> <br />to a state agreement as to the apportionment among states within <br /> <br />each division; 8, priorities in each division as to agricultur- <br /> <br />aI, domestic and municipal. That turns those around. You had <br /> <br />them turned around the other way, _ power and navigation. In <br /> <br />other words, you started in by giving the purpose which had <br /> <br />least priority first; I just inverted it, Those are the main <br /> <br />principles, aren't they? <br /> <br />MR. CARPENTER: Yes, all of it proceeding upon equal <br /> <br />,~ <br /> <br />apportionment of waters as recorded at Yuma between the two <br /> <br />divisions of the territory served and drained. <br /> <br />',) <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: In the main it consists of the rule of <br /> <br />actual equitable apportionment, in which this pact shall es_ <br /> <br />tablish the first step as between the upper and lower division. <br /> <br />MR. CARPENTER: Yes, sir, leaving the states in each of <br /> <br />the two divisions to work out their local problems as the facts <br /> <br />may justify, the facts in each case being more or less at <br /> <br />variance with the facts that might obtain in another case w1th- <br /> <br />'-t <br /> <br />in the division, <br /> <br />,.~ <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: New Mexico? <br /> <br />11th_S.F. <br />23 <br /> <br />31 <br />