Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OD23~2: <br /> <br />68 <br /> <br />SSSee generallY, Hoover v~ Kern County; 118 Calf App. 2d 139, <br />257 P.2d 492 (1953). Here the court held that while dedica- ~*t: <br />tion of streets is complete as soon as they are accepted by <br />, <br />the governing munioipal body, the worn of placing streets <br />in a proper condition by the subdivider is a condition pre- <br />. cedent to acceptance of the streets for maintenance purposes. <br /> <br />54The question of oompliance is not often litigated. 3 <br />ANDERSON 919.21 at 432 'states: ' < <br /> <br />The question whether a plat may be rejected on the <br />ground. that it does not comply with the zoning ordi- <br />nance has not been litigated frequently. Possibly <br />the lack of oases is explainable in terms of the <br />evident propriety of requiring a subdivision plan to <br />comply with other ordinances regulating the use of <br />land. <br /> <br />For cases sustaining requirements that plats comply with other <br />regulations see Imperato v. Zoning Ed. of Adjustment of Tenafly, <br />91 N.J. Super:-540, 221 A.2d 751 (1966); Sla'vson v. Zoning Bd. <br />of :Review, 217 A.2d 92 (1.966, R.I.) and cases cited in notes <br />~l, 72 infra. <br /> <br />553 ANDERSON 319.21 at 431 citing N.J. STAT. Atlli.tit. .40 <br />~55-L15. <br /> <br />56Stateex rel. Grant v. Kiefaber, T14 'Ohio App. '279, .1Sl N.E.2d <br />905 (l%OJ;-aff'd. 171 Ohio St; 326,170N.E.2d S48 (1960). <br /> <br />57 '. '_' <br />~, Hamer v. Town .of Ross., 59 Cal. 2d 776 ,3S:2 P,.2d 375 <br />(1963); (TJaSalle, National Ba~lk V. City of Highland Park" <br />27 Ill. 2d 350, lS9 N.E.2d 302 (1963). . <br /> <br />58See discussion in ANDERSONH9.23 at 435 et seq.' and cases <br />cited in note 16 at 436. See also YOKLEY, 943 at 91. <br /> <br />. , <br />. 59State ex rE!l. Mar-WE!ll, Inc. V. DOdge, 113 ohio App; llS, <br />17 Ohio Ops. 2d 111, 177 N.E.2d 515 (1960); Caruthers v. Bd. <br />of Adjustment, 290 S.W.2d340 (Tex. Civ. App. 1956). <br /> <br />60See, e.g., CONN. GEN. STAT. REV. ~S-26a (Supp. 1969).. N.J. <br />STAT ANN. 940:55-1.18 (1967). . <br /> <br />613 ANDERSON 920.01 at 510. For discussion see notes 9-17 of <br />Chapter Vof Part III and accompanying text:"""" <br /> <br />62~, N. Y. VILLAGE LAW 9119,e (McKinney 1966). <br />. ilie' <br />PSee, e.g., /statute" cited in note 104 of Chapter II,supra. <br /> <br />HFor discussion see 3 ANDERSON H9.20at428, ~20.13. at 534. <br /> <br />-.-'".-'., <br />'-~1.::1:. <br />