My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01829
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01829
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:32:59 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:40:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8030
Description
Section D General Compact Issues - US Water Resources Council
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
8/1/1971
Author
US Water Resources C
Title
Regulation of Flood Hazard Areas to Reduce Flood Losses - Draft - Volume II Part V - With Appendices
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />fj;[J2308 <br /> <br />66 <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning Carom., ~61 S.W.2d 619 (Ky. 1953) <br />(Planning Commission's zoning resolution with ultimate <br />effect of incorporating private properties into flood ~~~ <br />control ponding,areas held invalid. Su~division not <br />involved.) But see Metro Realty v. El ~orado county, <br />35 Ca1. Rptr:-48o-(1963) in which the court upheld an <br />interim county zoning ordinance which prohibited land <br />subdivision for one year at potential reservoir sites <br />while a county-wide water development and conservation <br />plan was being formulated. . <br /> <br />283 JI.NDERSON, AMERICAN LAW OF ZONING 919.02 at 380 citing <br />~. <br />Bd. of Superv~sors of Loudoun County v. Georgetown La~d Co., <br />2'04 Va, 380, 131 S.E,2d 290 (1963) <br /> <br />29'See Peninsula Corporation v. Planning and Zoning Com.-n'n. <br />of the '1'own of New Fairfield, 151 Conn. 450, 199A.2d I <br />(1964) . <br /> <br />30In re Sidebotham; 12 Cal. 2d 434,BSP.2d 453 (1938) cert. den. <br />307U.S. 643. <br /> <br />31peop1e v. Max\vel1, 162 Colo. 475, 427P. 2d310 (1967). <br /> <br />32~See Kass v. Lewin, 104 So.2d 572 (Fla. 1958) <br /> <br />33See, ~,'Noble v.Chairman and 11embers of Township Com- <br />. mitioRf': 91. N.eT. 81lpeX" 111, 2J9.A.2d 335 (1966); Stoker v. <br />Irvington, 71 N.J. Super 370, 177 A.2d 61 (1961). <br /> <br />34~ee, e.g., Robinson v. Lintz, 101 Ariz. 448, 420 P.2d <br />Magnolia Development Co., Inc. v. Coles. <br />10 N.J. 223, 89 A.2d: 664 (1952). <br /> <br />35Robin$on v. Lintz, 101 Ariz. 448, 420 P.2d 923 (1966). <br /> <br />3~E.g., Lordship Park Ass'n. v. Bd, of Zoning Appeals, 137.Conn. <br />84,""'"'75 A.2d 379 (1950) . <br /> <br />37Townof Lebanon v. Woods, 153 Con!}. 182, 215 A.2d 112 (1965). <br />See also cases and text accompanying notes 51-81 in <br />Chapter III of Part III, supra. <br /> <br />38Kligman v. Lautman, 53 N.J. 517; 251 A.2d 745 (1969). <br /> <br />39~, Murray Kentucky Subdivision Regulations, p.8 (Nov. <br />, ( 1962') <br /> <br />40See Iowa Natural Resources Council v. Van Zee, 261 Iowa' 1281 <br />158 N.W.2d III (1968) where the cpurt upheld a statutory <br />require11ent that an,app1ic~nt.for ~permit to construct an <br />o~struction il~ a flood plain fi1eengineerin~ plans certi- <br />f~ed by a re~~stered land surveyor or engineer. For other <br />cases uphold~ng require~ents that developers submit plans <br />~ Karl V. Wolsey Co. v. Building Inspector 324 Mass. 419, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.