My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01829
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01829
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:32:59 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:40:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8030
Description
Section D General Compact Issues - US Water Resources Council
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
8/1/1971
Author
US Water Resources C
Title
Regulation of Flood Hazard Areas to Reduce Flood Losses - Draft - Volume II Part V - With Appendices
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />JUDICIAL REACTION <br /> <br />002322 . <br /> <br />45 <br /> <br />5-332 <br /> <br />~;!~ <br /> <br />332. Defil:!i tiol:!' bf'Subdi vision. <br /> <br />, <br />As discussed in Section 5-230.1Z, most statutes <br /> <br />define subdivision to include division of a parcel for the <br />purpose of building or sale into twO" or more ilets. Some <br />definitions are less restrictive an~many definitionsinclud~. <br />exemptions and exceptions. While most enabling ,statutes in- <br />clude a definition of subdivision, those which do not have <br />been construed to authorize ,. each municipality to coin its. <br />own'definition.28 .If the enabling statutes include a defini- <br />tion and a planning agency adopts an'ordinance with a different <br />definition, the statutory definition and not the de~inition in <br /> <br />planning regulations detennines whether a partieu1a'r property <br />~s.a SUbdivision.29 DefiI'litions which regulate only. subdivid.ers <br />of five or more 10ts30 Or twenty.or more1ots31 have been <br />upheld against claims. that they discriminate against the <br />subdividers of large numbers of lots. However, an ambiguous <br />Florida statute whieh required all divisions of land less than <br />an acre be platted but did not apply to divisions greater than <br />an acre was held discriminat~ry and unconstitutiona~~32 <br />A definition which requires review for all divisions of <br />land will prevent evasion of the subdivision law but may place <br />a heavy financial burden upon the individual lot owner who <br />must prepare a detailed plat prior to sale ,of a single lot. <br />In some communities subdivision'Sof less than a specified <br />number of lots are afforded special treatment as "minor sub- <br />submission of 33 <br />divisions" which require some review but not/detailed plats. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.