My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01829
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01829
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:32:59 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:40:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8030
Description
Section D General Compact Issues - US Water Resources Council
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
8/1/1971
Author
US Water Resources C
Title
Regulation of Flood Hazard Areas to Reduce Flood Losses - Draft - Volume II Part V - With Appendices
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />on228~ <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />'<~ <br />"!<.""" <br />"fl.;:;, <br /> <br />" - j . . I <br />REGULA TOR y' PROGRAMS <br /> <br />5-220 <br /> <br />220. STATE~Li;;vtLSUBDIVISION CONTROLS <br /> <br />. . -. ,-' . . <br />221. State Land SUbdivision Sales Acts <br />, 4 ,', ',5 6 <br />Many states, including Arizona, California, Colorado, <br />, 7 8, ,9 10 12 ' <br />Florida, Hawaii, Minnesota, New Mexico, and Oregon <br /> <br />have adopted rea1,~st:ate sales "full disclo~ure" acts, Most ,of these <br /> <br />. ' .,._, <br />acts ,require the subdivider to file a registration statement with a <br /> <br />state agency and to prepare a property report for potential buyers. New <br /> <br />13 <br />Mexico requires only a property report. Colorado differs in requiring <br /> <br />oniy- registration of subdividers,l4 Some15 are modeled after the <br /> <br />Uniform Land Sales Practices Act16';'hich was published as recommended <br /> <br />state,legislation by the Council of State Governments in 1967. <br />, 'c, 17 <br />Some state acts are more comprehenSive than others Hawaii' <br /> <br />and New York18 apparently require approval for all subdivisions. <br />" 19 ' 20 " '21 <br />Oregon requires approval for four or more lots; Arizona and California <br />22 <br />require approval for five or more Iota; arid Colorado requires approval <br />M. , ,23' , 24',. ' <br />Innesota and Florida reqUIre approval for subdivisions <br /> <br />for 20 Or more. <br /> <br />of 50 or more lots. States acts typically exclude cemet~ry divisione, <br />, 25 <br />divisions for sale to a builder, and other common exemptione,' <br /> <br />The act~ often require statemlilnts of fact and certificatell so <br /> <br />that the review agency can evaluate the preeent and propolled condition of the land. <br /> <br />~[~i~; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.