Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In order to investigate the likely effects of socioeconomic development <br /> <br />in the Upper Colorado River Basin by the year 2000 without the emerging energy <br /> <br />l-'- <br />~ technologies, sediment-load budgets were constructed for the six study reaches <br />,..' <br />~ from the information provided by Andrews (1979). Schematic diagrams of the <br /> <br />, ~ <br />n,.t I."..,~ <br />-':> <br />oar he' <br /> <br />Fl",...!Jr"1. <br />"" )'f <br />'Ger hefl) <br />BLE:'" r <br />~ <br />arhere) <br />~J' <br /> <br />r Mre~ <br /> <br />C.E:....:. ",' <br />........."'.')'-.; <br /> <br />w ::.~:.:'l <br /> <br />study reaches were constructed to show the location of the mainstem and <br /> <br />tributary gaging stations. The study reaches are shown for the White River <br /> <br />(fig. 1); the Upper Colorado River (fig. 2); the San Juan River (fig. 3); the <br /> <br />Green River in Utah (fig. 4); the Green River in Wyoming (fig. 5); and the <br /> <br /> <br />Yampa River (fig. 6). Sediment-load budgets for these study reaches are <br /> <br />tabulated for the White River in table 4; the Upper Colorado River in table 5; <br /> <br />the San Juan River in table 6; the Green River in Utah in table 7; the Green <br /> <br />River in Wyoming in table B; and the Yampa River in table 9. In each table, <br /> <br />the inflow of sediment to the study reach at the upstream gaging station and <br /> <br />the outflow of sediment at the downstream gaging stations are shown. Depend- <br /> <br />ing upon the available data, the quantity of sediment delivered to the study <br /> <br />reach by tributary streams is also given. The estimated quantities of addi- <br /> <br />tional sediment which will be supplied to the study reaches due to population <br /> <br />growth and conventional coal utilization in the year 2000 are listed by source <br /> <br />and location. <br /> <br />.;:,. <br /> <br />9 <br />