Laserfiche WebLink
<br />! Ll36] <br /> <br />,-\RE.-\.OF.ORIGI:'-i PROTECT/O:" <br /> <br />~.+5 <br /> <br />1 <br />, <br />I <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />preSent ';:1]ue. pi:1ced in escrow at interest. ro be used by the basin of V' <br />ongln ro ccmpensate unprotected parries :1nd for whatever other pur- <br />pos~s its citizenry prefers. <br />Compensation should definitely nor be aimed at keeping water <br />prices or COStS of Water development to in-basin users from nsing as <br />water becomes scarcer. \\/ater orices should rerlect the real scarCl!V <br />,,,]ue of water, .-\s water is transferred outslde a basin because of its <br />greater value there. water does become scarcer in the basin than it <br />otherWIse would have been. The cost of water to users should rerlect <br />the fact of thIS scarcity and not the scarcllY of some bygone era, Pro- <br />visions like those in the Colorado W"ter Conservancy District Act dis- <br />cussed earlier.~) which require that "present. . . and, ' , prospective <br />appropriations of wmer ' , , nOl be impaired nor increased in cost" <br />distorr the real scarcity signals to in-basin water users and induce <br />them ro apply water to uses and in qu"ntities that are nOl justifiable in <br />light of current scarcities. <br />It is not clear that compensatory srorage will always be the most <br />useful form of compensation to the area of origin. Perhaps schools. <br />highways. or hospllals would be of greater benefit, given the hydro- <br />logic situation and other needs. Even when storage is the most useful <br />form of compensation. there is the issue of liming of construCl1on of <br />that storage, Clearly. it should be sized and timed in accordance with <br />the water needs of the area of origin, One official. mistaking inelTI, <br />ciency for foresight. recently Slated. "We built Green Mount"in Reser- <br />voir 4-5 ye:.lrs ;lgO. and now we need it." <br />These observations "Iso have implications for the institutions that <br />negotiate for "nd m"nage the resources gamed through compensation, <br />If negotiations over losses are to represent all of the unprotected losmg <br />p"nies identified above and if the uses of these compensatory resources <br />are to be determined in the interest of all losing parries and not JUSt <br />Water users, then a governmental unit of general jurisdiction should <br />control negotiations and manage the use of the compensatory <br />resources. <br /> <br />f; <br />" <br />! <br />!I <br />:1 <br />I <br />,I <br />, <br />il <br />'I <br />;1 <br /> <br />,: <br />I <br />f <br />i <br />I, <br />II <br />I' <br />I' <br />I <br />, <br />\ <br />i, <br />, <br />!I <br />i <br />., <br />'I <br /> <br />~I <br /> <br />~, <br /> <br />!I <br />, <br /> <br />F General Economic Guidelines for Compensation <br /> <br />By way of summary. the following general gUidelines concerning <br />compensation are otfered: <br />I. Cumpensation paid should equal the present value of net in- <br />comes and rublic amenities lost in the area of origin that are not pro- <br />t~('tt:u ~lIld~r ...:on\~!JtilJnJ.1 ~l.ppr()priation doctrin~. The rel~\~lnl <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />I <br />J <br /> <br />')oj S.~ 'IiO_"U l'1'll~.J.t'I <br />