Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C<) <br />,-0 <br />...; <br /> <br />With the Harvey Gap and Rifle Gap plan~ costs and repayment <br /> <br />then campare as follows: <br /> <br />Harvey <br />Gap <br />Plan <br /> <br />Silt Lands <br />Permissible irrigation charge, per <br />Estimated 0.& M. charge per acre <br />Construction repayment per acre <br />Net irrigable area served, acres <br />Annual construction repayment <br />Construction repayment in 40 years <br /> <br />acre $ 4.00 <br />1.98 <br />2.02 <br />4,400 <br />$ 8,890 <br />3.56,000 <br /> <br />Rifle Valley Lands <br />Repayment on 40 years by 1,100 acres <br />at sarr~ rate as Silt Lands. ~ <br /> <br />Total construction repayment in 40 years <br /> <br />35"6,000 <br /> <br />Estimated construction cost <br /> <br />4.58,000 <br /> <br />Rifle <br />Gap <br />Plan <br /> <br />$ 4.00 <br />2.20 <br />1.80 <br />6,000 <br />$ 10,800 <br />432,000 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />iI> 79,000 <br /> <br />.511,000 <br /> <br />1,24.5,000 <br /> <br />From the above tabulation it will be noted that repayment <br /> <br />ability fails to reach the requirements for full repayment under <br /> <br />either plan, with the Harvey Gap plan more nearly meeting such <br /> <br />requirements. <br /> <br />.' Development Period ReqUired <br /> <br />Anticipated changes in crops and farm practice with the <br /> <br />increased water supply, for lands already irrigated, are not <br /> <br />sufficiently extensive to require much of an adjustment period, <br /> <br />but there is an outstanding debt on the existing irrigation works <br /> <br />72 <br />