Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />\ 3. ~hat ar. th. pro.pect. for thi ..1. of proJect-.upplied w.t.r for <br />Irrigation or oth.r benellcial u.e. in the ,t.t. of Colorado? <br /> <br />Answ.r, Inquiries for project w.tlr .r. Iner.lsln;. S.y.ral .ntiti.. h.v. <br />inquir.d about th. pot,ntl.1 for proj.ct w.t.r which could be ayail.bl. for <br />irrigation purpo.e. or a. a pot.ntlal .Itern.tiy. .upply during dry y.ars. <br />This could hlPp.n only if Stagi ~ w.r. construct.d. <br /> <br />4. How lany .cr.-f..t of wlt.r In .n ay.rag. y..r would b. aVlllabl. for III.? <br /> <br />An.w.r. If Stag. ~ w.r. constructed. i3,800 AF would b. avallabl. for <br />1118. <br /> <br />~. What I. the projected COlt of the wlt.r If r.l.bur.abla ca.t. are to be <br />returnad to the Feder.1 gOYlrn..nt in accord.nce with the Rlela.ltion law? <br /> <br />Anewar. Ae de.crlb,d in Public Law 92-514, S.c. 104, all proj.ct w.t.r <br />costs .r. nonr.l.bur.able 'Kcept for priority 4 w.t.r. Priority 4 wat.r <br />tin b. I.de ayailabl. if St.g. 5 was tan.truct.d and If I r.p.yeent agree- <br />.ent with a wat.r u.er entity e.tablish.d. Only then can any rli.bursabl. <br />co.t. b. dater.in.d. <br /> <br />6. If IYailabl.~ what are tn. b.n.llt-to-cost ratio. lor 11th stlg' of the <br />proj.ct and lor th. .ntlr. proJ.ct? <br /> <br />Answ.r. Only th. bln.flt-to-tOst ratio for the entire project i. <br />.y.llable. That rltla is .4. <br /> <br />VI. W.t.r Quality <br /> <br />I., Art thtrt any dil'.rence. between wltlr qUIllty standards d.yelop.d under <br />the Wlter QUlllty Act of 196', a. cited In the proj,ct's orlgln.1 <br />authorization, and water quality .t.nd.rdl d,yelopld under current IIW, I.e., <br />the Cle.n Wat.r Act? <br /> <br />An.w.r. Vel, Color.do,h'l r.yls.d th.lr .tandardl e~ten.ivelv Ilnce the <br />196~ Water Qualltv Act, partlcullrly toncernlng trlce-h.lYV .atall far, <br />Cli.S I, Unconti.ln.t.d Nlt.r, and Cll.. 2, Nater. Requiring Di.iniection <br />Ind/or Water Trelt.ent. Thll. Iraa. wer. not cla..lfiad Ind r.gul.t.d it <br />the ti.. the 196~ N.t.r Qu.lity Act b,caa. liN. It "1 not until th. Cleln <br />Wetar Act of 1974 end thl Safl Drinking Niter Act of 1918 thlt tha.1 Ire. <br />w.r. Clillllild lnd r.gul.t.d. <br /> <br />2. Does Colorado have a non-degr.dation policy applicable to the Rio Brand.? <br />How .ight thl. Iffect project op.r.tionl? <br /> <br />Anlwer, VIS, currently Colorado ha. a non-degradation policy appllcAbl. to <br />tha Rio Grind. rlqulring the eMI.tlng us. will not b. IOlt by clallifled <br />UI.r.. Th. Colar.do Wattr QUillty Control Co.al..lon I. pre.ently <br />revl.wlng thll policy with the .1. of laking clrtain th.t it II in <br />confor..ncl with fedtral rlqulr..lnt.. Project operation. will not be <br />Iffected. <br /> <br />Y', f"12' Jl <br />u\..'v '!: <br /> <br />14-12 <br />