WSP01752 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.-l In :-"'> ~"J CHAPTER IV PLAN FORMULATION would discourage use of interspersed native lands, and second, the irrigated areas would be subject to damage by deer and elk attracted to stacked hay in winter or early grass growth in the spring. A program of habitat acquisition and development is included in this plan to lessen these adverse effects. Other wildlife species would be affected by the project, some beneficially, others detrimentally. There is no indica- tion at this time that any threatened or endangered species of fish or wildlife would be affected by project construction. Industrial use of project water would create secondary environmental considerations. Water for the coal and oil shale industries would sup- port large plants to convert coal to other energy forms. Specific plans and impacts are not known at this time, but such industries could affect social conditions, land use, wildlife, and water and air quality. In both cases, types of mining (surface or underground), locations, associ- ated conversion plants, environmental protection plans, and other fac- tors all enter into determining environmental effects. The furnishing of municipal and domestic water would tend to sup- port and direct growth. If properly planned and supported by the public, this could be a tool to preserve agricultural lands and wildlife habitat, while if not carefully planned, this aspect of the project could lead to unwanted growth and land use changes. Federal Environmental Management With Private Development A plan emphasizing environmental quality was discussed in some detail by the MOP team. This plan would preclude any Federal develop- ment but acknowledges that some private development would occur in the future. This plan supports the premise proposed by members of the MOP fish and wildlife sub team that in order to preserve fish and wildlife resources there should be no further development on the White River upstream from Meeker. It also supports the contention that to preserve its historic value no 'features should be constructed on the Thornburgh battle site. While this plan proposes no development by the Bureau of Reclama- tion or other Federal agency, it assumes that private development would be attempted in order to meet the needs discussed in Chapter II. Members of the MOP team have suggested that a study be conducted by the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation to determine if stretches of the White River should be designated a "Recreation River" under provisions of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. Such designation would limit further develop- ment. The large amount of private land and present level of development might exclude the river from qualification, however. 61