Laserfiche WebLink
<br />01787 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />coordination, planning and implementation of remedies to address these current <br />deficiencies in the cultural program through the development and application of <br />scientifically credible approaches to future monitoring, data recovery, and data <br />management. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Before science can be successfully applied, however, the future role of science in the <br />cultural program must be clearly defined; Therefore, it is critical that a plan for <br />managing cultural resourccs and associated activities within the program be in place prior <br />to treating cultural resources of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park. As <br />the lead agency for Section 106 compliance related to dam operations, it is essential that <br />the Bureau of Reclamation fully develop and implement a Historic Preservation Plan (as <br />called for under the current Programmatic Agreement) as soon as possible, rather than <br />continuing to operate in an ad hoc fashion under the Monitoring and Remedial Action , <br />Plan of the 1994 Programmatic Agreement. For serious progress to occur in the cultural <br />arena, the Historic Preservation Plan must be completed without further delay. The <br />Historic Preservation Plan needs to clearly specify the role that GCMRC will play to <br />meet program objectives that are fully consistent with its established role within the <br />AMP, including: I) providing independent, credible, objective, peer-reviewed scientific <br />information related to the effects of dam operations on cultural resources in the CRE; <br />2) developing and over-sighting a long-term monitoring program for cultural resources in <br />the CRE to document and track the effects of dam operations and the effectiveness of <br />mitigation efforts; 3) establishing scientifically-credible standards and research objectives <br />for data recovery at cultural sites in the CRE; and 4) managing the data that results from <br />these and other directly-related research and monitoring activities within the eRE. <br /> <br />It is also imperative thatthc National Park Service clearly and realistically define <br />its long-term objectives for managing and maintaining the integrity of register-eligible <br />historic properties within the CRE. These objectives must explicitly recognize and <br />address the reality that erosional processes and visitor impacts will continue to occur as <br />long as the Park is managed primarily as a "natural park" with wilderness-like <br />recreational objectives. The establishment of these management objectives is necessary <br />in order to have a credible basis for evaluating whether AMP activities, including flow <br />regimes, are meeting the stated objectives ofGCPA for the protection, mitigation of <br />adverse effects to, and preservation of cultural resources. <br /> <br />In order to meet GCP A and National Historic Preservation Act mandates to <br />monitor and mitigate impacts of dam-operations on historic propcrties, the GCMRC must <br />define and implement (through established cooperative agreements, competitively bid <br />RFPs, and other means) scientifically-credible approaches for monitoring status and <br />trends in resource condition, as well as fulfilling AMP objectives for implementing well- <br />conccived (scientifically defensible) mitigation strategies within the CRE. The selected <br />approaches and strategies need to be compatible with the objectives defined by the NPS <br />for long-term management of its resources; they also need to meet high professional <br />standards and produce high-quality information. GCMRC will work collaboratively with <br />the land managers and other AMP stakeholders to ensure that cultural resources are <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />USGS SBSC GCMRC Strategic Science Plan - FY 2005-2009 <br />Draft, October 22, 2004 <br /> <br />19 <br />