My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01703
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01703
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:32:21 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:37:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.450
Description
McElmo Creek Unit - Colorado River Salinity Control Program
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
7
Date
1/1/1983
Title
Onfarm Irrigation Improvements - McElmo Creek Unit Salinity Control Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />TABLE 1-4 ANNUAL LEVELS OF FUNDING FOR IMPLEMENTATION <br />McELMO CREEK SALINITY CONTROL STUDY, COLORADO <br /> <br /> Federal Cost -- <br /> Admin. " Education Total Local <br /> Construction Technical and 2/ Federal Const. Total <br />Year 1/ Assistance Evaluation Cost Cost 3/ Cost <br /> - -------- -- --- ------- --$1 ,000--- ------- ---- -- - <br />1 2,915 776 295 3,986 972 4,958 <br />2 2,915 776 295 3,986 972 4,958 <br />3 2,915 777 295 3,987 972 4,959 <br />4 2,915 777 295 3,987 972 4,959 <br />5 2,915 777 295 3,987 972 4,959 <br />6 2,915 777 295 3,987 972 4,959 <br />TOTAL 17,490 4,660 1,770 23,920 5,832 29,752 <br /> <br />1/ July 1981 Price Base. <br />2/ Includes $100,000 for an Irrigation Research Program by ARS, USDA; <br />$45,000 for an Information and Education Program by ES, USDA; and <br />$150,000 for Monitoring and Evaluation Results by SCS, USDA. <br />3/ In addition to the Local Construction Cost there will be Operation, <br />Maintenance and Replacement Cost, estimated to be $184,300 annually. <br /> <br />Plan 5 is recommended because it maximizes net benefits and has the <br />largest salinity reduction. Though feasible overall even with cost sharing <br />Plan 3 does not have enough onfarm benefits to cover the farmer's share of <br />installation costs and operation, maintenance and replacement cost. Plan 6 <br />was not feasible overall and did not provide enough onfarm incentives to <br />insure local support. <br /> <br />Implementation Authorities <br /> <br />There are three primary USDA authorities through which onfarm <br />improvements might be implemented. These are: <br /> <br />1. The Soil Conservation Act of 1935 (PL 46 - 74th Congress) <br />Under this authority and working mainly through local soil conservation <br />districts, the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) helps individuals, groups, <br />municipal and county officials, and planning bodies to cope with problems of <br />erosion, water supply and disposal, improper land use, flooding and <br />sedimentation. Assistance rendered by SCS ranges from advice and <br />consultation to on-site technical assistance for preparing conservation <br />plans; determining where conservation practices are practical and necessary; <br />designing, laying out, and supervising installation of the practices; and <br />checking and certifying performance of the practices. Through the <br />Agricultural Conservation Program administered by the Agricultural <br />Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASCS), USDA shares with the land <br />users the cost of applying certain soil and water conservation measures that <br />emphasize conservation benefits of national concern. <br /> <br />1-5 <br /> <br />OOiSlO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.