Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />,..... .'" r' 1 <br />,.; il,;j '" <br /> <br />CHAPTER IV <br /> <br />WATER Smrp1~--BAS,~T PROJECT <br /> <br />Basis and Period of Stu~ <br /> <br />An average annual yield of 40,000 a.cre-feet of water from Ruedi Res- <br />ervoir is considered to be available for the Basalt project. This yield <br />is based upon a llater supply study made for the Fryingpan-Arkansas project <br />and a tentative assignment of part of the Ruedi Reservoir water to future <br />western slope projects as discussed in the introduction to this volume. <br /> <br />Estimates of future water supplies available to the Basalt project <br />from local streams were based on recorded and estimated streamflows and <br />ditch diversion records for the 15-year period 1946 through 1960. This <br />period is considered to provide a conservative base for the estimates as <br />it includes the driest 3- and 10-year periods of record which were 1954- <br />1956 and 1947-1956, respectively. <br /> <br />Water Resources <br /> <br />Streamflow records and estimates <br /> <br />The stream-gaging station on Cattle Creek near Carbondale is the only <br />one that provided useful flow records of local streams near the Basalt <br />project area. The record at this station covered the period from October <br />1950 through September 1955. It "as extended to the 191;6-60 period by <br />correlation with f'lo"s of Smith Fork near Crawford, Colo. Some unpub- <br />lished staff gage records on Cattle and Coulter Creek were available but <br />were not used in project studies because State Water Co~~issioner stream <br />diversion records "ere considered a better sourCe of flow data. Diversion <br />records are often poor, however, particularly during high rlilloff seasons <br />when the abundant water supply' made careful stream administration unneces- <br />sary. Recorded diverSions from Cattle Creek often exceeded the total <br />creek flow. The diversion records were adjusted, therefore, to correlate <br />vi th the streamflov records and estimetes. Flows of other streams in the <br />project area were estimated by adjusting diversion records as seemed <br />appropriate. <br /> <br />Available vater supply <br /> <br />The major source of project w(rter vould be the Ruedi Reservoir. <br />Minor sources include Cattle. Coulter, Sopris. and Prince Creeks and <br />their tributaries, including Ilesa Creek. :It W8$ assumed that the entire <br />flo" of Fryingpan River "ould be required (1) to supply existing ditches <br /> <br />21 <br />