Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />i~$' ,,' ,,~ <br />k"j/..; <br /> <br />BASAm PROJECT <br /> <br />PROJECT PLAN, FEATURES, AND COSTS <br /> <br /> <br />alon!'; the condult, cutoff collars would be constructed around the conduit <br />at 20-foot intervals. Slide gates located in a gate chmnber would be <br />utilized to control releases from the reservoir. Access to the gate <br />chamber would be provided by a vertical shaft constructed over the cham- <br />ber and connected to the dam crest by means of a steel walkway. No <br />spillway would be required as the flow to the reservoir would be largely <br />regulated by releases from the Ruedi Reservoir and diversions from Cattle <br />Creek through the Mountain Meadow Canal. The natural drainage area above <br />the Missouri Heights Dam j.s only about 1, square miles "ith a maximum <br />probable annual runoff of about 3,000 acre-fcet. If necessary, this <br />amolmt of water could be stored by utilizing a portion of the 10 feet of <br />freeboard plallned for the dam. <br /> <br />The water surface of the enlarged reservoir would cover an additional <br />1,50 acres of privately owned agricultural and grazing lands. Trees and <br />brush in the reservoir basin would. be removed as required. No improvements <br />of consequence are on lands required for the enlargement. <br /> <br />Reconnaissance geological investigations have indicated that it <br />would be practicable to raise the existing dam. A red sandstone, known <br />as ~'aroon formation of Permian age, is the bedrock at the damsite. The <br />depth of bedrock at the dam site is unknown. The existing dam appears <br />to be stable, althOUGh some seepage losses do occur. The seepage should <br />be further investigated when detailed studies are made. <br /> <br />Materials for the enlarged dam, except free drainage gravels, are <br />available in the immediate vicinity of the dam. Gravels for use as con- <br />crete aggregate, construction of drains, and bedding for riprap could be <br />obtained from the Roaring Fork River channel about 10 miles south of the <br />dam site. <br /> <br />Basalt Conduit <br /> <br />The Basalt Conduit, with a capacity of 100 second-feet, would head <br />at the outlet works of the Huedi Dam and meander west;rard along the <br />southern slope of the Fryingpan River Canyon for approximately 10 miles <br />to a point where i.t would cross by siphon to the north side of the river. <br />Here the conduit would breillc out of the steep canyon into undulating <br />bench lands over which it would continue northwest for approxirrate~v 12 <br />miles to its terminus at the Missouri Heights Reservoir. The conduit's <br />total length of about 22 miles would incluce 9.6 miles of open earth <br />section, 10.5 miles of bench flume or conduit, and 1.9 miles of siphons. <br /> <br />The canyon section traversed by the conduit is generally rough with <br />steep sandstone ledges covered in most places vith talus accumulations <br />mixed with residual soils. Most cross slopes in this section range from <br />40 to 70 percent. Brush, aspen, and coniferous timber occupy much of the <br />canyon aligmnent and would have to be cleared. The conduit in this section <br />would consist largely of lined canal, bench flume, or closed conduit. <br /> <br />14 <br />