My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01683
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01683
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:32:14 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:36:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.200
Description
Paradox Valley Unit - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
4
Date
8/1/1974
Title
Project Overview - Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />.~.1fI <br /> <br />A <br />~, <br /> <br />deep. The data on hydraulic characteristics obtained from the tests can <br />be used to determine the optimum depth and spacing of the wells required <br />to control the inflow of brine to the river. <br /> <br />CRITERIA FOR ALTERNATIVE STUDIES <br /> <br />The purpose of alternative studies is to investigate comparative economic <br /> <br /> <br />m~thods of solving the Paradox Valley salt loading problem. A variety <br /> <br /> <br />of alternative measures have been and will continue to be considered <br /> <br /> <br />during the plan formulation process. An arrayal table which summarizes <br /> <br /> <br />costs and benefits of several alternative plans has been prepared along <br /> <br /> <br />with a narrative description of each. An attempt has been made to discuss <br /> <br /> <br />obvious environmental impacts and the apparent advantages and disadvantages <br /> <br /> <br />of each plan. Alternatives that appeared drastically infeasible were not <br /> <br /> <br />,studied .in .depth. Baseg. pn analys.esof. cpmparat.ive .alterntives, the most. <br /> <br /> <br />effective, economical, and environmentally compatible plan will be selected. <br /> <br />COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Alternative Plan #1 <br /> <br />Xn this plan the inflow of salt into the river would be reduced by drilling <br /> <br /> <br />a field of wells into the brine layer on both sides of the river and pumping <br /> <br /> <br />saline ground water from the wells to lower the interface between the relative- <br /> <br /> <br />ly fresh ground water and the underlying brine. The pumped brine would then <br /> <br /> <br />be conveyed to an evaporation pond for disposal. It is anticipated that <br /> <br /> <br />about 180,000 tons of salt per year could be removed which would otherwise <br /> <br /> <br />enter the r~ver. Drilled to a depth of approximately 250 feet, each'well would <br /> <br /> <br />be cased and designed to pump approximately 225 gallons per minute of brine, <br /> <br /> <br />which would be transported to a central collection point. The collected <br /> <br /> <br />flows would be piped for a distance of about .20 miles over the divide between <br /> <br /> <br />Paradox Valley and Dry Creek Basin to a large solar evaporation pond. The <br /> <br /> <br />basic plan is shown on the map of Alternative Plan No, 1. Project features <br /> <br /> <br />and costs are presented on the arrayal table of comparative alternatives. <br /> <br /> <br />The arrayal table also presents an economic analysis. <br /> <br />000593 <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.