Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,'~ " <br /> <br />-. ,;~ <br /> <br />"";.' <br />., <br />/ <br /> <br />:::;.'~" <br />i' f::n <br /> <br />r:".) <br />-, <br />c.\j <br /> <br />co <br />CQ <br /> <br />'.";ir <br />'/(/ <br />:.'"- <br /> <br />- 3 - <br /> <br />1938 - 9/l4 4,000 a. f. <br />1941 - 5/24 7,000 II II <br /> 8/20 8,000 II II <br /> 8/27 7,000 " " <br /> 9/23 15,000 " 11 <br />1946 - 8/27 10,~OO " 11 <br />1947 - 6/12 4,000 II II <br />1951 - 8/ 4 4,500 II II <br /> <br />From 4 of the floods, storage in excess of 10,000 acre-feet might <br />be possible and a finding of water in the reservoir would result in a regulated <br />supply below the reservoir for periods of a week or more, depending on the mag- <br />nitude of subsequent inflows, as compared with about three days of diversions <br />made from the flood flows historically. <br /> <br />i, <br /> <br />For the first 3 floods in 1941, subsequent inflows were such that <br />probably storage of more than 10,000 acre feet wDuld also have accumulated. <br />This would leave 5 floods during the 23 year period, on which the effect of <br />releases only for Water District 67 requirements would be to reduce Stateline <br />flows below historical amounts for one or two days, with a consequent red'l~t.ion <br />of diversion opportunity below the Stateline on those days. <br />