Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />tf. <br /> <br />,ilia t I walli; 'I; 0 o:r iD~ out is the fact 'I;}H.. t what eve"' :rulE! <br />they ani10unce in that case is SL1:,:,ly a rule to 1)c [.)';)li6d in <br />litig2~ion ~:e:re states fail to agree. But clearly we CEn <br />establish an;\, status irrespE!ctive of the :'u),es that mibht <br />apply in litigated cases. <br />I think t112t wnateve:r :rule is ap)J.ied b;r the :OU"l' erne <br />Court \"ould be a l'uls 6.edu.oed from an ir..te:"Dational aSflect, <br />probably one t;1at has been made :t':::om the ten tl'>o1.:sano, ;<Jeal's <br />ex;)erience, durine,' which ill<.lnkind. has ;,wdertbteil '1;0 develop <br />clvilitation thl'Ol,;,e,'h the Llse cf wate;.'. Tho S-u:pl.'er,le Cou:rt will <br />not liLh'tly dispose of thet <:-uesti on. :i:'h~ rule I;'ill receive <br />a [:rest deal of 'I;bous;,t on the ,JiJl't oj' COill~letent men of a <br />"reat deal of e:!.:;>e:!'ienc:e. at lea;;t ii au:!' "oj-,Go:r;, Df the case <br />is adopted. <br />';/e don 't need to) rito~J this pl'ocaedin" waiting fOl' tilat <br />:::nnou::!cement. do we? <br />A I w 0',: 10, :?:roceed STith caution. <br />Q Ii t'.18 ~u:p~' eme Gou:rt \lec ides in fuvo~' vi ,j~7omins, woulitn I t <br />that J';Jake our la'bo!'s a li".;tle iJo~'e d.i::1:icnlt )e~'haps'? <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />G. <br /> <br />A I th inl: any )Ossi ble concilmsi Oil th2. t the SUj,nel;le Court <br />may re&ch will li[,hten ti,e burden of this COjJJ;llisf3ion; that <br />thei!' :reason 3rd. ~udcment will be a sou:rce of iospiration to <br />this Commission to :'s/'ci1 a just aod ~el'mallent rule. <br />