Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />You expressed some fear, as l take it, in the G~lorado- <br />Wyoming' oase w,1el'e the Gu'rernment interveiJed allO. assuwed a <br />diffe!'ellt attitude from that taken by either Nyoming or Colo- <br />rado; that if the Government s~ould succee~ befure the Supreme <br />Court in tIle case now pending. it would not suit either Colo- <br />rado or Wyomin~, is that true? <br />I didn't really meao to oomnent on th2t theory. <br />YO\1, did.n't ste.te that, but assUJljing that they have a <br />diffe:rent theory, you expressed some fear that the Supreme <br />Court might -- <br />NQ, I ~idn't intend to. <br />Suppose the Su.preme CO',lrt should come to a decision be- <br />fore this Commission comes~o a deoision, then what should <br />this Commission do? <br />That provokes another 5ubgestion which I hau intended to <br />embody in my stat ement. yle all hope at least - you know hope <br />is all that v~s left in Pandora's box - that the Supreme <br />Court will announce a decision in the Uolorado-Wyoming oase. <br />It is possible that it \1'ill not i'm'nish a universal principle <br />or rule, but undoubtedly if it does decide the case, it will <br />announce a decision which will hGve an effect on this Com- <br />mission, or ol~ht to have. <br />If the;; decide in favo:r of the Government's position, <br />what can this Commission do? <br /> <br />A <br />Q <br /> <br />A <br />Q. <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />Q <br />