Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.' <br /> <br />'.) <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />anyone else unJ.8J:took i.t, cnd it ,;ould be necessary. \'/ould it <br />not, that the fullest development of the stored water should <br /> <br />be uni ertaken at onc e? <br /> <br />A 1'0. I ..uJuldn't think it was tleCessary. <br />Q It \rould bs good business wouldn't it? <br />A Well, if tae~e were no othe~ facts to consider, it would. <br />But considerin~ the fact that ell the states are interested <br />~ <br />in it, I doubt whether that is the controllini', fuctor. <br />Q Do you think the fullest irrigaticn should be undertaken <br />at once in California bnd below the dam? <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />I think there are other faotors at least equally impor- <br /> <br /> <br />tant to the recovering the cost speedily. <br /> <br /> <br />Don 't ~rou think it \'iou:Ld be proper and 1'ight to undertake <br /> <br /> <br />the aevelopmeilt of tho lanas belo\f! <br /> <br />Q, <br /> <br />A <br />Q. <br /> <br />In their due proportion, yes. <br />And the~e 130ds ~hen put under cultivation would obtaiu <br />a priority of l'ight acc.ording to YOUI legal understanding? <br />I take it thlit the: COillpact. if i~ \':as entEll'ed into qnd <br />e~acted into law woul~ place all &ppropriaoions on the same <br />ruot iD,,;. No Ltate would. hay\;; :Dr i.or i t7 in tl1e allowanc e of <br />the qusntit;J of water but they \"iould all be on the same foot- <br />in~. It would ;:ro-:rate. If there is an excess, tbey would <br />profit by it in due ratio. <br />But the la::Hls wou:!-d i10t. in d<,.to, obtain a }Hiol'i ty the <br />same as the lands in ~yoming? <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />Q <br />